PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 19, 2026Kardiologia Polska0 citationsOpen Access

Prognostic impact of heart failure guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with low blood pressure

View Full Paper
AFAna Catarina FonsecaCGCarlos GrijóACAdriana Costa

Key Result

In heart failure patients with systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg, the use of renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors was associated with a significant survival benefit (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.29-0.83).

Key Points

  • To evaluate the prognostic impact of guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure in patients with low blood pressure.
  • Retrospective study of outpatients with heart failure with left ventricular systolic dysfunction from January 2012 to December 2020.
  • Defined hypotension as systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg; followed patients until January 2023.
  • Performed Cox-regression analysis to assess treatment effects on mortality.
  • Out of 1206 participants, 645 (53.5%) died during follow-up, with 61.1% mortality in hypotensive vs. 52.3% in non-hypotensive patients (P=0.04).
  • RASi prescription significantly improved survival in both groups: hypotensive HR 0.49 (0.29-0.83), non-hypotensive HR 0.64 (0.50-0.80).
  • β-blocker use was associated with better survival only in non-hypotensive patients (HR 0.61 [0.46-0.81]).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=1,206)

Structured PICO

Does guideline-directed medical therapy (RASi and beta-blockers) improve all-cause mortality in heart failure patients with systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg?

P
Population
1,206 outpatients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction, mean age 71 years, followed for a median of 47 months.
E
Exposure
Guideline-directed medical therapy, specifically renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors (RASi) and beta-blockers (BB)
C
Comparator
Non-use of the respective guideline-directed medical therapies (observational comparison)
O
Outcome
All-cause mortalityhard clinical

In heart failure patients with systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg, renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors are associated with a significant survival benefit, whereas beta-blockers appear prognostically neutral.

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 0.49 (95% CI 0.29–0.83)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with hypotension have consistently been excluded from heart failure (HF) randomized controlled trials. AIMS: We aimed to study HF patients with hypotension. METHODS: Retrospective study of outpatients with HF with left ventricular systolic dysfunction followed from January 2012-December 2020. We defined hypotension as systolic blood pressure (SBP) <100 mm Hg. ENDPOINT: all-cause mortality. Patients were followed until January 2023. A Cox-regression analysis was used to study the prognostic impact of guideline-directed medical therapy separately in HF patients with SBP <100 mm Hg and those ≥ 100 mm Hg. Adjustments were made for confounders. RESULTS: We studied 1206 HF patients, mean age 71 years; 91.4% were on β-blockers (BB), 82.8% were on renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors (RASi); 29.6% on mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. SBP was<100 mm Hg in 157 (13.0%) patients. Hypotensive patients more often presented atrial fibrillation and severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction; they had lower hemoglobin and higher B-type natriuretic peptide; they were less medicated with RASi, but more with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and diuretics. BB was similarly prescribed in both groups. During a median follow-up of 47 (27-85) months, 645 (53.5%) patients died, 61.1 vs. 52.3% in hypotensive and non-hypotensive, P = 0.04. RASi prescription is associated with survival-benefit in both hypotensive (hazard ratio HR, 0.49 0.29-0.83) and non-hypotensive (HR, 0.64 0.50-0.80). BB predicted better survival in non-hypotensive (HR, 0.61 0.46-0.81), but not in hypotensive patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hypotension was associated with poor prognosis in HF patients. In patients with SBP <100 mm Hg BB use was prognostic neutral, however RASi use portended survival benefit. Despite their exclusion from most HF therapy trials, hypotensive patients appear to benefit from RASi drugs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fonseca et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (n=1,206). Renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors (RASi) vs. No RASi was evaluated on all-cause mortality (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.29-0.83). In heart failure patients with systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg, the use of renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors was associated with a significant survival benefit (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.29-0.83).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a359850dd3be7785e70ed86https://doi.org/10.33963/v.phj.113212
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Impact of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy on Systolic Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure and Low Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Hypotension in Heart Failure is Less Harmful if Associated with High or Increasing Doses of Heart Failure Medication: Insights from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry2023 · 25 citations
  3. 3Effect of low blood pressure on prognosis of acute heart failure2024 · 11 citations
  4. 4Systolic blood pressure lower than 130 mmHg in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes2025 · 13 citations
  5. 5Treatment Differences in Chronic Heart Failure Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction According to Blood Pressure2020 · 23 citations