PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 20, 2026npj Digital Medicine1 citationsOpen Access

Segmenting with confidence through uncertainty quantification for brain tumor imaging

YGYassine GuennounUniversity of California, San FranciscoPNPierre NedelecUniversity of California, San FranciscoMMMark McArthurUniversity of California, San Francisco

Key Points

  • The study aims to improve the reliability of AI in brain tumor imaging by quantifying uncertainty in automated segmentation.
  • Developed a deep learning framework using 1655 post-contrast T1-weighted MRIs for training.
  • Evaluated uncertainty estimates from homogeneous and heterogeneous ensembles on an independent test set of 68 MRIs.
  • Measured performance using Dice similarity coefficient and calibration of volumetric credible intervals.
  • The model achieved a median Dice score of 0.93, indicating high segmentation accuracy.
  • Uncertainty maps effectively aligned with neuroradiologist-identified ambiguous regions.
  • External validation in 353 patients supported generalizability, achieving a median Dice of 0.92.

Abstract

Abstract A major barrier to clinical adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) for brain tumor monitoring is the lack of calibrated uncertainty in automated segmentation, limiting clinician trust. We developed a deep learning framework that generates uncertainty estimates for meningioma segmentation on brain MRI. Evidential deep learning ensembles were trained on 1655 post-contrast T1-weighted MRIs (788 patients) to capture aleatoric-like and epistemic-like uncertainty. Architecturally homogeneous and heterogeneous ensembles were evaluated on an independent test set of 68 MRIs (43 patients) and compared with existing methods. Performance was assessed using Dice similarity coefficient, spatial agreement between uncertainty maps and neuroradiologist-identified ambiguous regions, and calibration of volumetric credible intervals. The model achieved high accuracy (median Dice 0.93), with uncertainty maps aligning with ambiguous regions and well-calibrated volume estimates. External validation in 353 patients confirmed generalizability (median Dice 0.92), supporting safer clinical AI deployment and enabling calibrated uncertainty estimation for lesion segmentation beyond meningiomas.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Guennoun et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a362f63db0793dc1a536d31https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02902-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper