PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 20, 2026Nutrients0 citationsOpen Access

Eating Disorder Risk Among Italian University Students: A Cross-Sectional Screening Study Using BMI, EAT-26, and EDE-Q 6.0

View Full Paper
VGValeria GostiACA. ColettaAVAndrea Carolina Vinci

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess the prevalence of eating disorder risk and dysfunctional behaviors in Italian university students.
  • Cross-sectional online screening study with 401 university students (306 women, 95 men)
  • Participants completed the EAT-26 and EDE-Q 6.0 questionnaires and self-reported anthropometric data
  • Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of eating disorder risk scores.
  • 37.9% of participants had a BMI outside the normal range, with 19.7% underweight and 18.2% overweight or obese
  • 28.4% exceeded the EAT-26 clinical cut-off (35.6% women, 5.3% men)
  • 21.0% exceeded the EDE-Q 6.0 clinical cut-off (25.8% women, 5.3% men)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Eating disorders (EDs) are among the most severe psychiatric conditions affecting young people, with increasing prevalence in the post-pandemic period. This study assessed the prevalence of ED risk and dysfunctional eating behaviors among Italian university students, a population poorly characterized with respect to ED risk, and examined associations with key socio-demographic and anthropometric variables. Methods: A cross-sectional online screening study was conducted between August 2023 and February 2026 with 401 Italian university students (306 women and 95 men). Participants completed the validated Italian versions of the Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26) and the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire 6.0 (EDE-Q 6.0), alongside self-reported anthropometric data. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of ED risk scores. Results: A total of 37.9% of participants had BMI outside the normal range (19.7% underweight; 18.2% overweight or obese). EAT-26 scores exceeded the clinical cut-off in 28.4% of participants (women: 35.6%; men: 5.3%). EDE-Q 6.0 global scores exceeded the clinical cut-off in 21.0% (women: 25.8%; men: 5.3%). Only 45.4% showed no anthropometric or questionnaire-based screening risk indicators (i.e., scores above the clinical cut-off on the EAT-26 or EDE-Q 6.0). BMI was negatively associated with EAT-26 scores in the total sample and in women, while a positive association between BMI and EDE-Q 6.0 scores was observed in men. Conclusions: A substantial proportion of Italian university students, particularly women, presented screening-based indicators of ED risk. The combined use of anthropometric and questionnaire-based screening tools provides a more comprehensive risk assessment than either measure alone, highlighting the need for multidimensional screening programs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gosti et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a363040db0793dc1a537760https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18121984
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper