PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 20, 2026Surgical Neurology International0 citations

Surgical management of intracerebral hemorrhage: A meta-analysis demonstrating improved functional outcome and survival with time-dependent functional benefit

AHAli HammedSRSteffen K. RosahlBYBilal Younes

Key Points

  • This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the impact of surgical management on functional outcomes and mortality in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.
  • Systematic review of 29 randomized controlled trials involving 5,531 patients comparing surgical evacuation to conservative management.
  • Primary outcomes assessed were functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale ≤3) and all-cause mortality, with subgroup analyses based on timing, location, volume, and technique.
  • Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for outcomes.
  • Surgical evacuation led to improved functional outcomes (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.17–1.46) and reduced mortality (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73–0.93) compared to conservative treatment.
  • Surgery within 24 hours resulted in a greater functional benefit with an estimated NNT of approximately 10 for favorable outcomes and 12 for mortality reduction.
  • No significant effect was found for hemorrhage location or surgical technique, while hematoma volume should be cautiously interpreted.

Abstract

Background: The role of surgical evacuation in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains controversial. Previous trials have yielded inconclusive results, and uncertainty persists regarding how hemorrhage location, hematoma volume, surgical technique, and timing of intervention influence functional outcomes and mortality. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 29 randomized controlled trials comprising 5,531 patients comparing surgical evacuation with conservative medical management. Primary outcomes were a favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤3 at final follow-up) and all-cause mortality. Prespecified subgroup analyses explored potential effect modification by timing of intervention, hemorrhage location, hematoma volume, and surgical technique. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Absolute effects and numbers needed to treat (NNT) were derived from pooled estimates using representative control event rates. Results: Surgical evacuation was associated with improved functional outcome (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.17–1.46) and reduced all-cause mortality (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73–0.93) compared with conservative management. Using representative control event rates, the pooled ORs correspond to an estimated absolute increase in favorable functional outcome of approximately 6–7% (NNT ≈15; range 11–26) and an absolute mortality reduction of approximately 4–5% (NNT ≈21; range 13–55), depending on baseline risk assumptions. In subgroup analysis, surgery performed within 24 hours showed greater absolute clinical benefit, corresponding to an estimated NNT of approximately 10 for favorable functional outcome and 12 for mortality reduction. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a statistically significant interaction between timing and functional outcome ( p = 0.005), with greater functional benefit observed when surgery was performed within 24 h. In contrast, mortality reduction did not differ significantly according to timing (interaction p = 0.25). No statistically significant effect modification by hemorrhage location was detected. Although effect estimates varied numerically across hematoma volume categories, formal interaction testing did not consistently demonstrate definitive effect modification. Conclusion: Surgical evacuation in spontaneous ICH is associated with improved functional outcome and reduced mortality compared with conservative management. Greater functional benefit was observed with earlier intervention. No statistically significant effect modification was detected for anatomical location or surgical technique, and subgroup differences by hematoma volume should be interpreted cautiously. These findings support consideration of timely and individualized surgical management in appropriately selected patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hammed et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a363040db0793dc1a5377a9https://doi.org/10.25259/sni_86_2026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper