PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 20, 2026Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy0 citations

The role of digital tools and artificial intelligence in supporting antimicrobial stewardship: a systematic review

View Full Paper
CSCarlos José Cortés SánchezFGFernando Salazar GonzálezJPJosé María Gómez Portolés

Key Points

  • To analyze the role of digital tools and AI in hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship programs and their effects on various clinical indicators.
  • Systematic review following PRISMA methodology
  • Bibliographic searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library from 2014 to 2025
  • Inclusion of articles on hospitalized patients using PICOS criteria
  • Thirty-one studies were included in the review
  • Clinical Decision Support Systems were the most used tools (58%)
  • Most studies reported improvements in therapeutic appropriateness and reduced antibiotic use, with limited impact on clinical outcomes.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial resistance is recognized by the WHO as one of the leading global public health challenges. Antimicrobial Stewardship Programmes (ASPs) aim to promote the rational and efficient use of antimicrobials, although their implementation faces various limitations. Digital tools and artificial intelligence (AI) emerge as strategies to improve the efficiency and outcomes of these programmes. OBJECTIVE: To analyse the role of digital tools and AI in hospital-based ASP interventions and their impact on clinical, microbiological and antimicrobial use indicators. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA methodology. A bibliographic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library (2014-25), as well as grey literature. Articles on hospitalized patients requiring antimicrobial treatment were included according to PICOS criteria. Risk of bias and methodological quality were assessed according to the type of study. Two independent researchers conducted the selection, evaluation and data extraction. A third researcher resolved discrepancies. RESULTS: Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. The most commonly used tools were Clinical Decision Support Systems (58%), followed by alerts in electronic health records, machine learning models, telemedicine and mobile applications. Most studies showed improvements in therapeutic appropriateness and reduction in antibiotic consumption. However, the impact on clinical and microbiological indicators was heterogeneous and of low quality. CONCLUSION: Digital tools applied in ASPs improve prescription quality indicators and reduce antimicrobial consumption. Nevertheless, their impact on clinical and microbiological outcomes remains limited. Standardized indicators and robust methodological studies are needed to confirm their real impact on ASP outcomes. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: This protocol has been registered in PROSPERO with the ID: CRD42024601221.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sánchez et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a363147db0793dc1a53829ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkag213
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper