PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 20, 2026International Journal of Cancer0 citationsOpen Access

Clinical Implementation and Oncological Relevance of Molecular Profiling in Brain Metastases Patients—A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

View Full Paper
MNMaria NikolaevaJBJacopo BellomoMGMeltem Gönel

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the implementation of molecular profiling in brain metastases and its impact on treatment strategies.
  • Multicenter retrospective cohort study including patients with brain metastases from melanoma, lung, and breast cancer.
  • Analysis of the discordance of cancer driver gene alterations between brain and extracranial tumors.
  • Evaluation of systemic therapy adjustments based on molecular profiles in a cohort of 1,431 screened brain metastases, with partial profiling in 723 cases.
  • Molecular analyses revealed discordant alterations in 18% of lung, 4.7% of melanoma, and 45% of breast cancer brain metastases when compared to extracranial tumors.
  • Systemic therapy adjustments based on molecular profiling occurred in 13%-27% of patients, depending on the primary tumor type.
  • Overall survival was significantly better in patients who underwent profiling, with a median of 19.3 months versus 9.9 months (p < 0.0001).

Abstract

Brain metastases (BM) require a multidisciplinary treatment approach combining surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy. While current guidelines recommend the analysis of established cancer driver genes in BM tissue, little is known about its real-life implementation and relevance on oncological treatment strategies. This retrospective multicenter study includes patients with BM from melanoma, lung and breast cancer operated between 2010 and 2022. Clinical records were evaluated for BM molecular analyses of predefined cancer drivers and their discordance to extracranial tumor sites, that is, ALK, BRAF, EGFR, KRAS, NTRK for lung, HER2, estrogen/progesterone receptor, BRCA1/2 for breast cancer and BRAF, KIT, NRAS among others for melanoma. Adjustment of systemic therapies based on BM molecular profiles was analyzed. Among 1431 BMs screened for availability of molecular analysis, molecular profiling was performed at least partially in 723 BMs (51%). In cases with matched extracranial tumor samples (n = 276), discordant alterations were found in 18% of lung, 4.7% of melanoma and 45% of breast cancer BMs. Molecular BM analyses informed systemic therapy adjustments in 13%-27% of patients depending on the primary tumor. Overall survival was significantly better in patients who underwent BM profiling, especially when operated in recensst years (median 19.3 vs. 9.9 months; p < 0.0001) and in patients with breast cancer who had a change in systemic therapies upon BM profiling (p = 0.0085). In conclusion, molecular profiling of BM allows selecting available treatment options for a substantial subset of patients. This study underscores the need for more systematic molecular testing in BM patients to guide systemic treatment decisions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nikolaeva et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a3631fbdb0793dc1a538be4https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70611
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Abstract 3785: Clinical and genomic characterization of melanoma brain metastases2024
  2. 2Genomic Drivers of Brain Metastases in Lung Cancer2026
  3. 3Genetic profiles of oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer and corresponding brain metastases2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Abstract 2107: Genomic landscape of melanoma brain metastases: Real-world analysis and comparison with public melanoma cohorts.2026
  5. 5A mutational process signature and genomic alterations associated with outcome and immunogenicity in cancers with brain metastasis2025