PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 20, 2026New Microbes and New Infections1 citationsOpen Access

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Biomarker in Erythema Nodosum Leprosum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

View Full Paper
SSSiti Azyyati Nur ShadrinaSKStarla Gracelie KarlinaSSSyalikha Arviandra Subhan

Key Points

  • This review aims to evaluate the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with erythema nodosum leprosum compared to non-reactional leprosy.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 and PECO framework.
  • Searched multiple databases for observational studies comparing NLR in ENL and non-reactional leprosy.
  • Assessed quality using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and estimated pooled mean differences using a fixed-effect model.
  • Identified five studies involving 162 ENL and 423 non-reactional leprosy patients.
  • NLR was significantly higher in ENL with a pooled mean difference of 5.79 (95% CI 4.58–6.99; I2=56%; P<0.00001).
  • Supported the use of NLR as a low-cost biomarker for ENL.

Abstract

Objectives Erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL) is a severe type 2 leprosy reaction causing recurrent episodes, nerve damage, and disability. Diagnosis still relies on clinical assessment and tests often unavailable in resource-limited settings. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived from routine complete blood counts, has been proposed as a low-cost inflammatory biomarker. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess differences in NLR between ENL and non-reactional leprosy. Methods Following PRISMA 2020 and a PECO framework, we searched PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Google Scholar up to 20 November 2025 for observational studies reporting NLR in ENL versus non-reactional leprosy. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Pooled mean differences were estimated using a fixed-effect model in RevMan 5.4.1, with heterogeneity evaluated by Cochran's Q and the I 2 statistic. Results Of 677 records, five observational studies (162 ENL and 423 non-reactional leprosy patients) met the inclusion criteria. NLR was higher in ENL, with a pooled mean difference of 5.79 (95% CI 4.58–6.99; I 2 = 56%; P < 0.00001). Conclusions NLR is markedly elevated in ENL compared with non-reactional leprosy, supporting its potential as a simple, low-cost biomarker. Prospective studies are needed to define optimal cut-off values for routine use.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shadrina et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a363224db0793dc1a538c1fhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2026.101786
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Whole blood transcriptomics reveals the enrichment of neutrophil activation pathways during erythema nodosum leprosum reaction2024 · 6 citations
  2. 2Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in odontogenic infection: a systematic review2024 · 14 citations
  3. 3CLINICAL COURSE OF ERYTHEMA NODOSUM LEPROSUM: AN 11-YEAR COHORT STUDY IN HYDERABAD, INDIA2006 · 198 citations
  4. 4Meta-analysis of the role of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in neonatal sepsis2023 · 41 citations
  5. 5Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a severity predictor of leprosy reaction2024 · 1 citations