PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 20, 2026Behavioral Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Development and Validation of the Social–Emotional Competence Questionnaire for College Students

View Full Paper
CLChao LiLXLiu Xiu-li

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop and validate a tool that measures social-emotional competence in college students.
  • Developed a questionnaire with 30 items based on literature review and expert evaluation.
  • Collected 1008 responses from undergraduate students, using a split-sample approach for analysis.
  • Conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to assess the questionnaire's structure and validity.
  • The exploratory factor analysis confirmed a five-factor structure explaining 60.619% of the variance.
  • Confirmatory factor analysis showed good model fit with CFI = 0.915, TLI = 0.905, RMSEA = 0.063.
  • The questionnaire demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = 0.958) and a strong test–retest correlation (r = 0.939).

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and validate a Social–Emotional Competence instrument for college students. The questionnaire includes 30 items across five dimensions: self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, interpersonal communication, and sense of responsibility. The items were selected from an initial pool of 42 items generated through a comprehensive literature review, semi-structured interviews, and expert evaluation. A total of 1008 valid responses were collected from undergraduate students. The dataset was randomly divided into two independent samples. Sample 1 (n = 504) was used for item analysis and exploratory factor analysis, while Sample 2 (n = 504) was employed for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and assessing the reliability and validity of the questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis supported a five-factor structure, accounting for 60.619% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the model fit the data reasonably well, with CFI = 0.915, TLI = 0.905, RMSEA = 0.063, and SRMR = 0.046. The questionnaire demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = 0.958) and maintained strong stability over time, as evidenced by a test–retest correlation of r = 0.939. Criterion-related validity was supported by significant positive correlations with interpersonal competence and negative correlations with emotion regulation difficulties and depressive symptoms. Taken together, these results provide preliminary support for the reliability and validity of the instrument, suggesting that it may serve as a practical tool for evaluating social–emotional competence among college students.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a3632a0db0793dc1a53926ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/bs16061024
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Screening Depressed Patients in Family Practice1972 · 1,851 citations
  2. 2An empirical study of the effects of social-emotional competence on Chinese college students' interpersonal relationship circles from a relational theory perspective2024 · 14 citations
  3. 3A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling2014 · 36,584 citations
  4. 4Emotional intelligence: New ability or eclectic traits?2008 · 1,661 citations
  5. 5Perceived social support and depression: longitudinal mediating roles of gratitude and meaning in life2025 · 10 citations