PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 20, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Bird in the Hands: the role of verbal working memory and visuo-spatial working memory in children's receptive speech-gesture integration

View Full Paper
CSC. Schwartz

Key Points

  • To explore the relationship between verbal and visuo-spatial working memory and children's ability to integrate speech and gesture.
  • Children completed tasks measuring verbal and visuo-spatial working memory.
  • Participants watched a story where ambiguous speech was clarified with gesture.
  • Assessments focused on successful speech-gesture integration during the storytelling.
  • Higher verbal working memory was associated with greater success in speech-gesture integration.
  • Visuo-spatial working memory did not show a significant relationship with integration success.

Abstract

The use of the gesture to complement verbal language has proven a valuable tool for learning, understanding, and remembering information. Yet, in order to fully benefit from co-speech gesturing, one must be able to successfully integrate information across the two modalities. Little is known about the sources of individual cognitive differences that may help to explain discrepancies in one's ability to integrate gesture and speech (Demir-Lira, 2018). In fact, the majority of earlier studies in the gestural literature have focused on group comparisons in order to understand multimodal language at a general level, eschewing an exploration of individual variation (Ozer and Goksun, 2020). Further, the majority of previous work has focused on the impact of childrens' gestural production on comprehension, warranting a closer look at how gestural observation benefits the listener (Wu and Coulson, 2014). The current investigation explored the relationship between two aspects of individual difference in cognition, namely verbal working memory and visuo-spatial working memory, and speech-gesture integration. Children completed tasks to gauge these two aspects of working memory and then watched and listened to a story where ambiguous speech was simultaneously clarified with gesture. Crucially, in order to understand the global meaning of the story, a child would have to successfully integrate the speaker's speech with his gesture. We found that higher rates of verbal working memory, but not visuo-spatial working memory, were associated with a greater likelihood of successful speech-gesture integration.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

C. Schwartz (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a3632a0db0793dc1a539358https://doi.org/10.6082/3dtv0-y5k70
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Individual differences in working memory predict the efficacy of experimenter‐manipulated gestures in first‐grade children2024
  2. 2Visuospatial memory, gesture imitation, and gesture-supported sentence comprehension in children with developmental language disorder2026
  3. 3Speech and Gesture in Sync: Investigating Temporal Integration Across Childhood.2026
  4. 4How Gesture Benefits Learning: A Working Framework for Examining Attention and Memory Mechanisms2025
  5. 5Gesture as a mechanism of change in the interface between spatial language and cognitive development2026 · 1 citations