PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 20, 2026Sensors0 citationsOpen Access

Physics-Informed Neural Network with Residual Correction Architecture for Hybrid Feedforward–Feedback Temperature Control of DFB Semiconductor Lasers

View Full Paper
XYXiongfei YinSSS Y Sun

Key Points

  • The study aims to improve temperature regulation of DFB semiconductor lasers using a hybrid control method.
  • Developed a physics-informed neural network (PINN) with a residual correction architecture.
  • Utilized high-fidelity three-node TEC simulator for ablation experiments.
  • Appended temporal lag features to the input to enhance internal thermal state reconstruction.
  • PINN achieved R2 = 0.966 at 3% training budget, outperforming pure NN with R2 = 0.930.
  • Closed-loop validation showed the PINN+PID hybrid settled 60% faster than standalone PID.
  • Tracking RMSE decreased by 69%, and peak disturbance deviation reduced by 74% across various scenarios.

Abstract

Wavelength stability of distributed feedback (DFB) semiconductor lasers in dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) systems hinges on sub-millikelvin temperature regulation, a task complicated by the nonlinear, multi-node dynamics of the thermoelectric cooler (TEC) and the purely reactive nature of conventional proportional–integral–derivative (PID) control. We present a physics-informed neural network (PINN) built around a residual correction architecture for hybrid feedforward–feedback TEC temperature control. Rather than penalizing physics-residual violations in the loss function, the architecture wires a simplified one-node thermal model directly into the network graph as a frozen baseline. A trainable branch then learns only the residual mismatch. Temporal lag features are appended to the input so that the network can reconstruct unmeasured internal thermal states from the cold-side temperature history, which proves essential for overcoming the partial-observability bottleneck inherent in multi-node TEC packages. Ablation experiments on a high-fidelity three-node TEC simulator show that all model variants (PINN, physics-feature-augmented NN, and pure NN) exceed R2 = 0.993 when trained on the full dataset, yet the PINN’s advantage becomes pronounced under data scarcity. At a 3% training budget, it reaches R2 = 0.966 versus 0.930 for the pure NN, implying an approximately 5.4× reduction in the data needed to reach a given accuracy target. In closed-loop validation, the PINN+PID hybrid settles 60% faster than standalone PID. Tracking RMSE drops by 69%, and peak disturbance deviation falls by 74%, across step, multi-setpoint, and current-perturbation scenarios. All results reported here are obtained in simulations. Experimental validation on physical DFB-TEC hardware is left to future work.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a3632d2db0793dc1a539514https://doi.org/10.3390/s26123869
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Temperature Control Based on Fuzzy Neural Networks for High-Power Laser Diodes2025
  2. 2A Physics-Informed Hybrid Neural Network for High-Precision Temperature Prediction in Semiconductor Process Equipment2026
  3. 3Leveraging Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Temperature Field Transfer From Single-Track to Multi-Track Multi-Laser Additive Manufacturing2025 · 1 citations
  4. 4Physics-informed neural networks for predicting laser-tissue interaction in maxillofacial reconstruction surgery2026
  5. 5Novel Method to Improve the Convergence of Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Complex Thermal Simulations2025