PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 21, 2026Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology0 citationsOpen Access

Chromosome-Scale Genome Remodeling in Tumor Evolution: Copy Number Alterations and Structural Variants as Two Sides of the Same Coin

View Full Paper
DSDaisuke SatoSMSatoru MiyawakiYSYu Sakai

Key Points

  • This review explores how copy number alterations and structural variants work together in tumor evolution.
  • Framed CNAs and SVs as complementary facets of chromosomal aberrations.
  • Discussed the mechanisms underlying CNAs and SVs, emphasizing their roles in reshaping cancer genomes.
  • Used existing detection technologies to highlight the integration of catalogs into concepts.
  • Identified that CNAs require chromosomal breakage and often coincide with SV junctions.
  • Highlighted that whole-chromosome aneuploidy and whole-genome doubling reflect mitotic failure, reshaping karyotypes.
  • Demonstrated that SVs can alter copy number and rewire regulatory architecture, rooted in double-strand break formation.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Chromosome-scale genomic rearrangements are a dominant force in tumor evolution. Copy-number alterations (CNAs) and structural variants (SVs) constitute two complementary axes of this process. Although detection technologies now deliver near-comprehensive catalogs, technical resolution has outpaced conceptual integration. In this review, we frame CNAs and SVs as inextricable facets of chromosomal aberrations. They reshape cancer genomes through altered gene dosage and three-dimensional regulatory rewiring. CNAs quantify the gene-dosage imbalance, yet arise through mechanistically distinct routes. Segmental CNAs typically require chromosomal breakage, and therefore often coincide with SV junctions. By contrast, whole-chromosome aneuploidy and whole-genome doubling (WGD) primarily reflect mitotic or cytokinetic failure and can occur without local breakpoints, while nevertheless reshaping the karyotypic landscape and seeding subsequent structural complexity. SVs, in turn, range from unbalanced events that alter copy number to ostensibly balanced exchanges that predominantly rewire regulatory architecture. Despite their diverse and sometimes catastrophic architectures, SVs are ultimately rooted in double-strand break formation and error-prone resolution. By integrating CNAs and SVs within a unified mechanistic and functional framework, we aim to convert catalogs into concepts and distill the organizing principles that govern tumor genome evolution.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sato et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a377fdd24f042ddf4c5a1a1https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2026.105441
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1p53 Mutations in Human Cancers1991 · 8,119 citations
  2. 2A theory of marginotomy1973 · 1,837 citations
  3. 3Disruptions of Topological Chromatin Domains Cause Pathogenic Rewiring of Gene-Enhancer Interactions2015 · 2,316 citations
  4. 4DNA double-strand breaks: signaling, repair and the cancer connection2001 · 2,474 citations
  5. 5Regulation of the subcellular shuttling of Sgo1 between centromeres and chromosome arms by Aurora B-mediated phosphorylation2014 · 13 citations