PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 1986Circulation195 citations

Systemic vascular resistance: an unreliable index of left ventricular afterload.

View Full Paper
RLRoberto M. LangKBKenneth M. BorowANAngélica Paula Neumann

Structured PICO

Does systemic vascular resistance accurately reflect left ventricular afterload compared to left ventricular end-systolic wall stress during pharmacological interventions?

P
Population
8 dogs instrumented with central aortic microtip and Swan-Ganz thermodilution catheters
I
Intervention
Infusions of nitroprusside, methoxamine, dobutamine, and norepinephrine to alter left ventricular afterload and contractility
C
Comparator
Control conditions (baseline values before each drug infusion)
O
Outcome
Relationship between systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and left ventricular end-systolic wall stress (sigma es)surrogate

Systemic vascular resistance is an unreliable index of left ventricular afterload as it reflects only peripheral arteriolar tone and can change discordantly with true left ventricular systolic wall force.

Abstract

Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) is a frequently used clinical index of left ventricular afterload. However, SVR may not adequately assess left ventricular afterload (i.e., ventricular internal fiber load during systole) since it reflects only peripheral vasomotor tone. In contrast, left ventricular end-systolic wall stress (sigma es) reflects the combined effects of peripheral loading conditions and left ventricular chamber pressure, dimension, and wall thickness. To determine the relationship between SVR and sigma es, left ventricular afterload and contractility were pharmacologically altered in eight dogs instrumented with central aortic microtip and Swan-Ganz thermodilution catheters. Left ventricular wall thicknesses and dimensions were measured from two-dimensionally targeted M mode echocardiograms. Aortic, right atrial, and left ventricular end-systolic pressures as well as cardiac output were recorded. SVR and sigma es were determined under control conditions as well as during infusions of nitroprusside, methoxamine, dobutamine, and norepinephrine. Control data acquired before each drug infusion were similar. When compared with baseline values, SVR underestimated the magnitude of change in left ventricular sigma es by 22% when afterload alone was decreased (nitroprusside), 54% when afterload alone was increased (methoxamine), and 50% when afterload was decreased and contractility was augmented (dobutamine). Most importantly, when afterload was minimally decreased in association with augmented contractility (norepinephrine), SVR increased by 21% while sigma es fell by 9%. Thus, discordant changes in left ventricular afterload (i.e., sigma es) and SVR can occur during pharmacologic interventions. SVR is an unreliable index of left ventricular afterload, reflecting only peripheral arteriolar tone rather than left ventricular systolic wall force. This emphasizes the fact that a true measure of left ventricular afterload must consider the interaction of factors internal and external to the myocardium.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lang et al. (1986) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a39cd9ac5135fa86afa1e70https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.74.5.1114
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effects of Alterations in Aortic Impedance on the Performance of the Ventricles1964 · 152 citations
  2. 2Outflow Resistance as an Independent Determinant of Cardiac Performance1961 · 92 citations
  3. 3Afterload as a primary determinant of ventricular performance1963 · 247 citations
  4. 4Fourier Analysis of Left Ventricular Performance1971 · 57 citations
  5. 5Effect of Afterload on Force-Velocity Relations and Contractile Element Work in the Intact Dog Heart1966 · 27 citations