PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 23, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Saddle-Node Bifurcation Induces Cognitive Rigidity in a Multi-Timescale Model of Neuromodulator-Gated Synaptic Plasticity

View Full Paper
MSMd Labib Sazal

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how saddle-node bifurcations impact cognitive flexibility affected by neuromodulators in neural circuits.
  • 15-dimensional dynamical system reduced to a 1-dimensional model using geometric singular perturbation theory and center manifold reduction.
  • Incorporation of different neural dynamics and plasticity mechanisms from thalamus, amygdala, and prefrontal cortex.
  • Analytical derivation of predictions related to cognitive rigidity and recovery times based on bifurcation analysis.
  • Identified four emotional arousal regimes affecting cognitive flexibility: hypo-arousal rigidity, bistable flexibility, critical transitions, and hyper-arousal rigidity.
  • Predicted sharp prefrontal activity jumps at critical thresholds, with specific recovery times scaling inversely with the distance to bifurcation.
  • Demonstrated accelerated synaptic consolidation under hyper-arousal conditions due to saturation effects, maintaining these relationships under various conditions.

Abstract

A 15‑dimensional dynamical system with three well‑separated timescales is reduced, via geometric singular perturbation theory and center manifold reduction, to a one‑dimensional core exhibiting saddle‑node bifurcations. The model incorporates fast neural population dynamics (thalamus, amygdala, prefrontal cortex), fast dopamine clearance, slower serotonin and norepinephrine turnover, and very slow Hebbian plasticity gated by neuromodulator‑selective pathways. The bifurcation analysis partitions the effective emotional arousal into four regimes: hypo‑arousal rigidity, a bistable window of cognitive flexibility, critical transition points, and hyper‑arousal rigidity. Hysteresis is inherent, explaining why reducing arousal alone often fails to restore flexibility. Three experimentally testable predictions are derived analytically: a sharp prefrontal jump at the critical threshold, critical slowing down with recovery time scaling as the inverse square root of the distance to the bifurcation, and accelerated synaptic consolidation under hyper‑arousal due to simultaneous saturation of neural activity and neuromodulatory gating. The persistence of these scaling laws under stochastic noise, slow adaptation, and sigmoidal nonlinearities is demonstrated numerically. The work provides a mechanistic framework for arousal‑dependent cognitive rigidity in psychiatric disorders and a biologically grounded blueprint for continual‑learning architectures that avoid catastrophic forgetting.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Md Labib Sazal (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a3a225d111626ef22ab6fe2https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20787257
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper