PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 27, 2026Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation0 citations

Optimal portfolio selection in mutual aid insurance under smooth ambiguity and habit formation

View Full Paper
QLQi LiuGWGe WangQZQing Zhou

Key Points

  • This research investigates how individuals optimally select portfolios in mutual aid insurance while accounting for smooth ambiguity and habit formation.
  • Developed a mathematical model for mutual aid insurance using a three-state Markov chain process.
  • Applied an extended Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation with regime switching to derive equilibrium strategies.
  • Conducted numerical simulations to assess the impact of implications on various utility and ambiguity preference functions.
  • Demonstrated that the Tobin–Markowitz separation theorem is invalid under ambiguity aversion.
  • Identified different equilibrium strategies for various combinations of utility and ambiguity preferences.
  • Highlighted the significance of mutual aid insurance in enhancing lifetime utility.

Abstract

In this article, we explore the optimal portfolio selection problem for an individual who participates in mutual aid insurance and purchases life insurance under an environment where smooth ambiguity and habit formation coexist. The individual invests in a market with one risk-free and two risky assets whose unknown market prices result in ambiguity. Habit formation depends on historical consumption and is state-dependent. We construct a mathematical model for mutual aid insurance based on a three-state (good, bad, and death) process driven by an inhomogeneous Markov chain. Meanwhile, the individual hedges mortality risk via life insurance. We apply an extended Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation with regime switching to solve for the equilibrium strategies that maximize the individual’s lifetime utility. Subsequently, we analyze three combinations of utility and ambiguity preference functions, power–power, exponential–power, and exponential–exponential, and obtain equilibrium strategies under different functional forms. A key finding shows that the Tobin–Markowitz separation theorem is no longer applicable when ambiguity aversion is considered. Finally, we conduct numerical simulations to demonstrate the significance of mutual aid insurance, measure parametric impacts on equilibrium strategies, and provide theoretical guidance for mutual aid product design.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a3f69caaea7db3c19540837https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2026.2690153
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper