PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 16, 2018Stroke164 citationsOpen Access

Rescue Stenting for Failed Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke

View Full Paper
YCYoonkyung ChangBKByung Moon KimOBOh Young Bang

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Effective rescue treatment has not yet been suggested in patients with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) failure. This study aimed to test whether rescue stenting (RS) improved clinical outcomes in MT-failed patients. Methods— This is a retrospective analysis of the cohorts of the 16 comprehensive stroke centers between September 2010 and December 2015. We identified the patients who underwent MT but failed to recanalize intracranial internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery M1 occlusion. Patients were dichotomized into 2 groups: patients with RS and without RS after MT failure. Clinical and laboratory findings and outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. It was tested whether RS is associated with functional outcome. Results— MT failed in 148 (25.0%) of the 591 patients with internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery M1 occlusion. Of these 148 patients, 48 received RS (RS group) and 100 were left without further treatment (no stenting group). Recanalization was successful in 64.6% (31 of 48 patients) of RS group. Compared with no stenting group, RS group showed a significantly higher rate of good outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 0–2; 39.6% versus 22.0%; P =0.031) without increasing symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (16.7% versus 20.0%; P =0.823) or mortality (12.5% versus 19.0%; P =0.360). Of the RS group, patients who had recanalization success had 54.8% of good outcome, which is comparable to that (55.4%) of recanalization success group with MT. RS remained independently associated with good outcome after adjustment of other factors (odds ratio, 3.393; 95% confidence interval, 1.192–9.655; P =0.022). Follow-up vascular imaging was available in the 23 (74.2%) of 31 patients with recanalization success with RS. The stent was patent in 20 (87.0%) of the 23 patients. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor was significantly associated with stent patency but not with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Conclusions— RS was independently associated with good outcomes without increasing symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage or mortality. RS seemed considered in MT-failed internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery M1 occlusion.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chang et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a405455b509485089ccff29https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.117.020072
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Stenting as a Rescue Treatment After Failure of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Anterior Circulation Large Artery Occlusion2016 · 132 citations
  2. 2Causes and Solutions of Endovascular Treatment Failure2017 · 126 citations
  3. 3Self-expanding stents for recanalization of acute cerebrovascular occlusions.2007 · 202 citations
  4. 4The Impact of Recanalization on Ischemic Stroke Outcome2007 · 1,455 citations
  5. 5Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials2016 · 7,812 citations