PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 2011Pharmacogenomics52 citations

Impact of Genetic Variants on Post-Clopidogrel Platelet Reactivity in Patients After Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

View Full Paper
OROrsolya RidegAKAndrás KomócsiTMTamás Magyarlaki

Key Result

CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles exhibited a gene-dose effect on post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity, with homozygote carriers having the highest risk for HTPR and adverse ischemic events at 1 year.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=189)

Blinding

placebo-controlled

Randomization

randomized

Structured PICO

Do genetic variants in CYP2C19, ABCB1, and PON-1 affect post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes in patients after elective percutaneous coronary intervention?

P
Population
189 patients after elective stent implantation who participated in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial, evaluated for the effect of genetic variants on clopidogrel response.
I
Intervention
Clopidogrel 600 mg loading dose, stratified by CYP2C19 loss-of-function (*2, *3) and gain-of-function (*17) allelic variants, ABCB1 (3435 C→T and 2677 G→T/A) and paraoxonase-1 (PON-1; 192 Q→R) SNPs
C
Comparator
Non-carriers of the respective genetic variants (e.g., non-LOF carriers)
O
Outcome
Post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity determined with light transmission aggregometry and vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation (VASP-PRI) 12-24 h after 600 mg clopidogrelsurrogate

CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles exhibit a gene-dose effect on post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity and are associated with increased ischemic risk after elective PCI.

Limitations

  • The study was not powered to clinical outcome
  • Study was not powered to clinical outcome

Abstract

AIM: To determine the effect of various SNPs on post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity and clinical outcome. MATERIALS *2, *3) and gain-of-function (GOF; *17) allelic variants, together with ABCB1 (3435 C→T and 2677 G→T/A) and paraoxonase-1 (PON-1; 192 Q→R) SNPs were analyzed in 189 patients after elective stent implantation who participated in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (NCT00638326). Platelet reactivity was determined with light transmission aggregometry and vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation (VASP-PRI) 12-24 h after 600 mg clopidogrel. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) was defined according to the consensus definition (ADP 5 µM >46%; VASP-PRI>50%). RESULTS: In the case of CYP2C19 genotypes, a gene-dose effect was observed in ADP reactivity with the lowest values in GOF homozygotes and the highest degree in patients carrying two LOF alleles. The odds for HTPR also increased with the number of LOF alleles. There were no significant differences in platelet reactivity according to PON-1 or ABCB1 genotypes. In multivariate analysis, the presence of a CYP2C19 LOF allele turned out to be the independent determinant of HTPR. Although the study was not powered to clinical outcome (not LOF heterozygotes), only patients with two LOF alleles had a significantly higher risk for cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or unplanned target vessel revascularization at 1 year compared with non-LOF carriers. CONCLUSION: Genetic variants in CYP2C19 have a gene-dose effect on post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity, with homozygote LOF carriers having the highest risk for HTPR and for adverse ischemic events. Neither ABCB1 nor PON-1 genotypes significantly influenced platelet reactivity or outcome.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rideg et al. (2011) conducted an RCT in elective percutaneous coronary intervention (n=189). CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles vs. non-LOF carriers was evaluated on High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR). CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles exhibited a gene-dose effect on post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity, with homozygote carriers having the highest risk for HTPR and adverse ischemic events at 1 year.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a406683af768a5aebd70ca5https://doi.org/10.2217/pgs.11.73
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper