PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 29, 2026Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering0 citationsOpen Access

Matrix Viscoelasticity Regulates Dermal Fibroblast Activation in a Three-Dimensional Fibrillar Microenvironment

GGGianna GathmanMPM PatelDWDaniella I. Walter

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate the effects of matrix viscoelasticity on dermal fibroblast activation in a three-dimensional environment.
  • Utilized 3D alginate collagen I hydrogels with varying stiffness and stress relaxation rates.
  • Dermal fibroblasts were encapsulated in hydrogels with distinct mechanical profiles (soft: 3 kPa, stiff: 10 kPa, fast/slow stress relaxing).
  • Evaluated fibroblast activation via changes in morphology and expression of activation markers.
  • Fibrillar alginate collagen networks increased fibroblast spreading and stress fiber formation in slow relaxing or stiff matrices.
  • Activation markers such as fibroblast activation protein-α showed enhanced expression in these matrices.
  • Slow relaxing matrices promoted ECM remodeling, with increased fibronectin deposition and local collagen fiber network remodeling.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Fibrosis is the pathological remodeling of the extracellular matrix (ECM) that is largely orchestrated by activated fibroblasts. The mechanical properties of the ECM change drastically during fibrosis, and fibroblasts become increasingly activated by mechanical environments that mimic the properties of fibrotic tissues. While the effects of increased elastic modulus (stiffness) on fibroblast activation have been well-studied, the impact of changes in viscoelasticity is less clear. Here, we sought to determine how fibroblast activation is altered by changes in viscoelasticity in a three-dimensional, fibrillar microenvironment. Methods We employed 3D alginate collagen I hydrogels with independently tunable stiffness and stress relaxation rates. Dermal fibroblasts were encapsulated in hydrogels with four distinct mechanical profiles (soft: 3 kPa or stiff: 10 kPa, fast stress relaxing: τ 1/2 ≈ 160 s or slow stress relaxing: τ 1/2 ≈ 1600 s). We assessed fibroblast activation by changes in cell morphology, expression of key activation markers, and evidence of ECM remodeling. Results Fibrillar alginate collagen networks enhanced fibroblast spreading, α-smooth muscle actin stress fiber formation, and fibroblast activation protein-α expression in matrices that were slow relaxing or stiff. The presence of the fibrillar network further enhanced fibroblast activation, independent of the changes driven by matrix viscoelasticity. ECM remodeling was also promoted by slow relaxing matrices, with increased fibronectin deposition and more remodeling of the local collagen fiber network. Conclusions Our results demonstrate that fibroblast activation is highly responsive to matrix stress relaxation rate, and that models incorporating fibrillar, viscoelastic networks can provide new insights into the role of ECM mechanics driving fibroblast activation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gathman et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a420b08f91bb43ea919227ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-026-00918-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper