PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 30, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Ev Framework — Transformation as the Fundamental Process of Physical Reality

View Full Paper
DVDiego Vannoli

Key Points

  • The research aims to propose the Ev framework, which treats transformation as a fundamental aspect of physical reality, potentially surpassing the role of time.
  • Introduces four quantities: evolutionary velocity, evolutionary amplitude, structural complexity, and coherence coefficient.
  • Suggests a geometric interpretation where systems are trajectories in a configuration landscape using the Fisher–Rao metric.
  • Presents analogies with concepts from radioactive decay, mammalian allometry, and controlled combustion.
  • Advances a single falsifiable prediction concerning temporal asymmetry and its dependence on both entropy production and the configurational path length.
  • Proposes that certain processes can be better understood through this transformation-centric lens, indicating a need for further exploration.

Abstract

This paper presents a conceptual and mathematical framework, here called the Ev framework, which explores the hypothesis that transformation — the succession of distinguishable configurations of a physical system — may be more fundamental than time, and that time may be an emergent description of this process. The proposal does not modify the equations of general relativity, quantum mechanics or thermodynamics; it introduces an additional descriptive level intended to characterise the configurational dynamics of systems. Four quantities are introduced: an evolutionary velocity, an evolutionary amplitude, a structural complexity (interpreted as the dimensionality of the configuration space), and a coherence coefficient. A geometric interpretation is proposed in which a system is a trajectory in a configuration landscape, with the Fisher–Rao metric of information geometry as a natural ruler for configurational distance. The framework is presented honestly as a research programme rather than a completed theory. The structural correspondences discussed (radioactive decay, mammalian allometry, controlled combustion) are treated as motivating analogies, not as evidence. A single falsifiable prediction is advanced: that the temporal asymmetry of a process may depend not only on entropy production but also on the length of the configurational path, measured by the Fisher–Rao metric.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Diego Vannoli (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a435c65759b888809a52dcchttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21012313
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evoltropic Theory: Evolution as a Fundamental Physical Process2026
  2. 2Toward a Transformation-Based Theory of Everything in Fundamental Physics2026
  3. 3Evoltropic Theory: A Phenomenological Framework for Emergent Time, Emergent Space, and Gravity2026
  4. 4The Evolution Field: An Emergent Geometric Framework for Spacetime, Lorentz Kinematics, Gravitational Evolution, and Finite-Capacity Gravity2026
  5. 5Time as the Rate of Becoming: An Evoltropic Framework for Physical Time, Gravitational Evolution, and Finite Curvature2026