PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2026Sustainability1 citationsOpen Access

A Practical Framework for Cradle-to-Site Embodied Carbon Assessment: Application to a Multifamily Residential Building in Faro, Portugal

View Full Paper
MOMiguel José OliveiraMPManuel Duarte PinheiroMVMateo Vergara

Key Points

  • This study aims to develop a framework for assessing cradle-to-site embodied carbon in buildings to enhance transparency and accuracy in evaluations.
  • Developed a structured methodology for quantifying embodied carbon from cradle-to-site (A1–A4) in multifamily buildings
  • Utilized data from geographically representative Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) and applied an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for material selection
  • Identified and quantified carbon hotspots such as ready-mix concrete and reinforced steel.
  • Total embodied carbon was calculated at 228 kg CO2e/m2, with ready-mix concrete contributing approximately 40%
  • Reinforced steel accounted for around 11% of total impacts, with masonry systems and other materials contributing over 75% of total embodied emissions
  • The framework emphasizes that a few material categories dominate the carbon footprint, aiding in targeted decarbonisation efforts.

Abstract

The growing importance of embodied carbon (EC) in building decarbonisation requires transparent, context-specific Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approaches. This study develops a practical framework for quantifying cradle-to-site EC (A1–A4), combining detailed post-construction material quantification with a structured data selection methodology. Carbon factors (CFs) are primarily sourced from geographically representative Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) and evaluated through a reliability framework that incorporates material similarity, geographical proximity, and data completeness. An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is further applied to select representative values for key materials such as ready-mix concrete. The application of this framework highlights the critical influence of data representativeness on EC results and demonstrates a transparent and reproducible approach for reducing uncertainty in early-stage assessments. The case study yields a total EC of 228 kg CO2e/m2, with structural materials identified as the main carbon hotspots: ready-mix concrete accounts for approximately 40% of total impacts, reinforcing steel for around 11%, while masonry systems, infill, and levelling layers contribute a significant additional share. Together, these materials represent slightly more than 75% of total embodied emissions. Beyond the numerical results, the study shows that a limited number of material categories dominate the carbon footprint, enabling targeted decarbonisation strategies. The proposed framework is designed to be transferable to similar building contexts and supports more robust, data-driven decision-making in the Portuguese construction sector and beyond. It is particularly relevant in regions where locally representative environmental data are not necessarily sufficient, as it provides a structured approach for developing embodied carbon assessments under such condition.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Oliveira et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a44af325cd2549c8bc4447dhttps://doi.org/10.3390/su18136590
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Quantification of Embodied Carbon (EC) for Residential Development Project2025
  2. 2EPBD IV: Decarbonization Strategies Through a BIM-LCA Workflow—Case Study of a Crèche Design in Montoro, Southern Italy2026
  3. 3Life cycle assessment-based multi-dimensional evaluation of embodied carbon in concrete structures and structural scheme optimization2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4Whole Building Life Cycle Assessment of New Multi-Unit Residential Buildings in Southern Ontario2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5Whole Building Life Cycle Assessment of New Multi-Unit Residential Buildings in Southern Ontario2024