PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 21, 2014Hypertension233 citations

Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696, a First-in-Class Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor, in Asian Patients With Hypertension

View Full Paper
KKKazuomi KarioNSNingling SunFCFu‐Tien Chiang

Key Result

LCZ696 at doses of 100 mg, 200 mg, and 400 mg significantly reduced clinic diastolic blood pressure compared with placebo in Asian patients with hypertension (P<0.0001).

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=389)

Blinding

double-blind

Randomization

randomized

Structured PICO

Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce blood pressure in Asian patients with hypertension?

P
Population
389 Asian adults aged ≥18 years with hypertension, randomized to LCZ696 or placebo for 8 weeks.
I
Intervention
Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) 100 mg, 200 mg, or 400 mg for 8 weeks
C
Comparator
Placebo for 8 weeks
O
Outcome
Mean difference across the 3 single-dose pairwise comparisons of LCZ696 versus placebo in clinic diastolic BP after 8-week treatmentsurrogate

Sacubitril/valsartan effectively and safely reduces clinic and ambulatory blood pressure in Asian patients with hypertension over an 8-week period.

Main Result

p-value: p=<0.0001

Abstract

LCZ696 (Japanese adopted name: sucabitril valsartan sodium hydrate), a first-in-class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, concomitantly inhibits neprilysin and blocks angiotensin type 1 receptor. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the first in Asia for this drug, evaluated the dose-related efficacy and safety of LCZ696 in patients with hypertension using 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring. Asian patients aged ≥18 years (n=389) with hypertension were randomized to receive LCZ696 100 mg (n=100), 200 mg (n=101), 400 mg (n=96), or placebo (n=92) for 8 weeks. The primary end point was mean difference across the 3 single-dose pairwise comparisons of LCZ696 versus placebo in clinic diastolic BP after 8-week treatment. Key secondary efficacy variables included changes in clinic systolic BP and pulse pressure and changes in 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime ambulatory BPs and pulse pressure. Safety assessments included recording all adverse events and serious adverse events. A total of 362 patients completed the study. Reductions in clinic systolic BP, diastolic BP (P<0.0001), and pulse pressure (P<0.001) were significantly greater with all doses of LCZ696 than with placebo. There were also significant reductions in 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime ambulatory systolic BP, diastolic BP, and pulse pressure for all doses of LCZ696 compared with placebo (P<0.0001). LCZ696 was well tolerated, and no cases of angioedema were reported. In conclusion, LCZ696 is effective for the treatment of hypertension in Asian population and, in general, is safe and well tolerated. Clinical Trial Information- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01193101.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kario et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in hypertension (n=389). LCZ696 vs. placebo was evaluated on mean difference across the 3 single-dose pairwise comparisons of LCZ696 versus placebo in clinic diastolic BP after 8-week treatment (p=<0.0001). LCZ696 at doses of 100 mg, 200 mg, and 400 mg significantly reduced clinic diastolic blood pressure compared with placebo in Asian patients with hypertension (P<0.0001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a45ac6245fd8cfa32f82a0bhttps://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.113.02002
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper