PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 4, 2026Electronics0 citationsOpen Access

Modeling Discretionary Lane-Changing Decisions: A Multi-Vehicle Information Enhanced Machine Learning Approach

View Full Paper
CZChenqiang ZhuJYJiao YaoAAAyihen Aernali

Key Points

  • The aim is to improve predictions of lane-changing decisions by considering both immediate and long-term traffic factors.
  • Analyzed discretionary lane-changing trajectory data from the US101 dataset.
  • Identified key latent variables influencing lane-changing decisions qualitatively and ranked them quantitatively.
  • Constructed a prediction model using ensemble learning and various processing methods.
  • Safety-related features like spacing with the following vehicle (dLag, 0.187) outperformed benefit-related features (v¯T, 0.091).
  • The KNN model achieved the best performance (F1 = 0.79, AUC = 0.97) using the full feature set.
  • SMOTE+Tomek processing method attained the best balance (F1 = 0.68) among five methods.

Abstract

Accurately predicting human lane-changing (LC) decisions is critical for enhancing the safety and efficiency of autonomous driving. Most existing machine learning-based LC decision models rely on immediate neighboring vehicle interaction features, which may fail to capture drivers’ consideration of long-term traffic conditions in the target lane. Using discretionary LC trajectory data from the US101 dataset, this paper first qualitatively identifies key latent variables influencing LC decisions, then quantitatively ranks these factors using feature importance analysis, and finally constructs a prediction model based on ensemble learning. The analysis reveals that drivers consider not only neighboring vehicles but also multi-vehicle information further ahead, particularly the average speed and average spacing of multiple preceding vehicles. Feature importance ranking shows that safety-related features, especially the spacing with the following vehicle in the target lane (dLag, 0.187), rank significantly higher than benefit-related features such as the average speed of the target lane (v¯T, 0.091), suggesting that safety considerations play a dominant role in the observed LC decisions. Among five imbalanced processing methods, SMOTE+Tomek achieves the best balance (F1 = 0.68). When the Full Feature Set is used, the KNN model achieves the best performance (F1 = 0.79, AUC = 0.97) among six baseline models. This study contributes to the understanding of LC behavior and provides insights that could inform future development of LC prediction models for autonomous vehicles.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a48a3cb89561a0c2d78d72fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15132912
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1TGLD: A trust-aware game-theoretic lane-changing decision framework for automated vehicles in heterogeneous traffic2025 · 4 citations
  2. 2Decision making of autonomous vehicles in lane change scenarios: Deep reinforcement learning approaches with risk awareness2021 · 301 citations
  3. 3Quantitative indicator of homeostatic risk perception in car following2012 · 128 citations
  4. 4Risk-informed longitudinal control in autonomous vehicles: A safety potential field modeling approach2023 · 20 citations
  5. 5How does lane status influence drivers’ lane-change decisions? — An analysis based on naturalistic driving data2025 · 3 citations