PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 5, 2026Engineering Structures0 citationsOpen Access

Structural design optimization of concrete slabs: A systematic review

View Full Paper
MDMax DombrowskiPMPaul MerzMZMax Zorn

Key Points

  • This review aims to synthesize 25 years of research on structural design optimization of concrete slabs and its applications.
  • Searched 906 records to identify 63 relevant publications using PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
  • Analyzed 151 mathematical optimization problems across eight slab types and assessed various optimization methods.
  • Evaluated algorithm choices, OP complexity, and provided insights on design issues.
  • Flat, solid, and ribbed slabs comprise over 85% of the optimization problems identified.
  • Few studies (10%) relate to real construction projects, highlighting a gap in practical application.
  • Issues of heterogeneous formulations and inconsistent reporting prevent the findings from being effectively transferable.

Abstract

Structural design optimization (SDO) has long promised to revolutionize structural design, yet its impact on everyday engineering remains limited. This review synthesizes 25 years of research on SDO of concrete slabs in buildings. Increasingly volatile and conflicting objectives, and the rise of non-standard, material-efficient slab systems, challenge established design methods. SDO can address such problems by formulating them as mathematical optimization problems (OPs). Following PRISMA 2020, we identified 63 relevant publications from 906 records, comprising 151 OPs across eight slab types. We analyze OP formulations, analysis and optimization methods, and design insights. Flat, solid, and ribbed slabs account for more than 85% of OPs, while non-standard slab systems remain rare. OP complexity ranges from 1 to > 100,000 variables and 0–49 constraints, yet no recurring formulation defines a standard OP for any slab type. Metaheuristics dominate algorithm choice, although cross-class benchmarks provide limited support for this dominance. Many studies provide design insights, only 10% address real projects, and no optimized design is reported as built or issued for construction. Heterogeneous OP formulations, inconsistent reporting, weak baselines, and insufficient cross-class algorithm benchmarking hinder comparability and prevent study-specific insights from becoming transferable design guidance. Key research gaps include representative cross-class benchmarking suites, further work on analysis and solution-mapping surrogates, expanded case studies on non-standard slab systems, and multi-objective optimization under objective-input uncertainty.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dombrowski et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a49f547f5d1d45b288003dahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.123268
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Theoretical and numerical constraint-handling techniques used with evolutionary algorithms: a survey of the state of the art2002 · 2,333 citations
  2. 2A mesh adaptive direct search algorithm for multiobjective optimization2009 · 82 citations
  3. 3Surrogate-based analysis and optimization2005 · 2,413 citations
  4. 4The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology2016 · 5,482 citations
  5. 5Optimization of post-tensioned concrete slabs for minimum cost2022 · 20 citations