PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 5, 20260 citationsOpen Access

International Commercial Arbitration and Public Policy: The View from Canada

View Full Paper
FAFalcone, Thomas, A.

Key Points

  • This paper aims to clarify the stance of Canadian common law courts on public policy in international arbitration.
  • Examined the statutory regime surrounding international arbitration in Canada.
  • Reviewed leading cases across various Canadian common law jurisdictions.
  • Analyzed court interventions regarding public policy grounds for arbitral awards.
  • Identified key principles guiding Canadian courts on public policy in international arbitration.
  • Outlined insights drawn from case law regarding the enforcement of international arbitral awards.
  • Provided clarity on judicial discretion related to public policy interventions.

Abstract

Understanding when municipal courts might intervene in an international arbitral award on public policy grounds requires looking at what courts in the states that are signatory to the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration have actually done and said when seized of applications to stay an award or refuse its enforcement. This paper seeks to offer a clarity on the position of Canadian common law courts on this issue. After examining Canada’s statutory regime vis-à-vis international arbitration, it examines leading cases from different Canadian common law jurisdictions on the public policy question. This paper concludes by outlining a number of principles and insights gleaned from the jurisprudence that can be said to form the basis of the Canadian conception of the public policy of provisions of the Model Law.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Falcone, Thomas, A. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a49f6c9f5d1d45b28800f4ehttps://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.404255
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper