PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 6, 2026European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases0 citationsOpen Access

Nocardia antimicrobial susceptibility testing by microdilution: evaluation of ready-to-use plate including tedizolid and meropenem

MDMateo DutarteCGCharlotte GenestetGLGérard Lina

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a new ready-to-use antimicrobial susceptibility testing plate for Nocardia species.
  • Compared the new FRNOCAR1 plate to the standard RAPMYCOI plate using 133 clinical Nocardia isolates
  • Assessed plate acceptability based on FDA criteria including error rates
  • Measured minimal inhibitory concentrations of tedizolid and meropenem among the isolates
  • FRNOCAR1 met all FDA criteria for 6 antimicrobials; however, VME rates exceeded acceptable limits for 5 antimicrobials
  • Tedizolid MIC50/MIC90 were lower than linezolid by 2-3 dilutions (0.5/0.5 µg/mL and 2/4 µg/mL)
  • Imipenem showed better efficacy than meropenem against N. farcinica, with meropenem's MIC at least 2-dilutions lower for certain Nocardia species.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Nocardiosis is a rare but serious infection occurring predominantly in immunocompromised patients. The CLSI microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing is recommended for all nocardioses. Ready-to-use plates are available (Sensititre™ RAPMYCOI), but antimicrobials of interest (e.g. tedizolid, meropenem) are lacking. At the request of the French nocardiosis reference medical biology laboratory, a plate including meropenem and tedizolid was produced (Sensititre™ FRNOCAR1). Methods FRNOCAR1 was compared to RAPMYCOI using 133 clinical Nocardia isolates containing predominantly N. farcinica (23.3%), N. cyriacigeorgica (24.8%), and N. nova complex (21.1%). Acceptability was assessed using the FDA criteria (essential/category agreement; major, and very major error VME rates). Results All criteria were respected for 6 antimicrobials; for 5, the upper limit of the VME rate exceeded the criteria, despite a point estimate of 0.0%, due to a lack of resistant strains in the collection. For linezolid, the VME rate could not be calculated due to the absence of linezolid-resistant strains. Tedizolid minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC)50/MIC90 were 2–3 dilutions lower than that of linezolid (0.5/0.5 µg/mL and 2/4 µg/mL, respectively). Imipenem was better than meropenem for N. farcinica ; meropenem MIC was at least 2-dilutions lower than that of imipenem for N. gamkensis (8/8), N. gipuzkoensis (2/4), and N. wallacei (4/6). Conclusion For the antimicrobials common to both plates, the FRNOCAR1 demonstrated good agreement compared with RAPMYCOI. FRNOCAR1 includes tedizolid and meropenem, for which MIC could be reported upon justified request, with a comment indicating that these results are pending further validation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dutarte et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a4b453d997070ff83b5b222https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-026-05588-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper