PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 6, 2026ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Cross-Sensor Robustness sand Spatial Generalization for 3D Railway Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation

AGArshia GhasemlouMSMario SoilánJBJesús Balado

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess the robustness and generalization capabilities of deep learning models for 3D semantic segmentation across different sensors and environments.
  • Three models (Point Transformer V3, MinkUNet, Swin3D) were trained on the SemanticRail3D dataset.
  • Evaluations were conducted on a new railway section scanned by three different LiDAR systems.
  • An ensemble fusion strategy was tested to reduce variability across sensor outputs.
  • Substantial performance variations were observed across sensors, influenced by point density and noise levels.
  • Domain-shift effects showed significant per-class IoU differences, impacting model prediction reliability.
  • The ensemble fusion strategy demonstrated potential in mitigating cross-sensor variability.

Abstract

Abstract. Accurate semantic segmentation of 3D railway point clouds is essential for enabling automated inspection and asset management. Although recent deep learning (DL) models achieve strong performance on large benchmark datasets, their ability to generalize to point clouds captured with different sensors and in different spatial environments remains insufficiently explored. This study investigates the cross-sensor robustness and spatial generalization of state-of-the-art DL architectures for 3D semantic segmentation in railway scenarios. Three advanced models, Point Transformer V3, MinkUNet, and Swin3D, were trained on the SemanticRail3D dataset and evaluated on a newly acquired railway section scanned using three heterogeneous LiDAR systems: a terrestrial laser scanner (Faro Focus S150+), and two handheld mobile mapping devices (CHCNAV RS10 and GeoSLAM ZEB Go). The test area was manually annotated to provide high-quality ground truth for quantitative assessment. Results show substantial performance variations across sensors, driven by differences in point density, noise levels, and scanning geometry. Domain-shift effects were evaluated directly from the model prediction outputs, including per-class IoU differences, uncertainty patterns, and cross-model agreement across sensors. To improve the robustness, an ensemble fusion strategy is evaluated to mitigate cross-sensor variability. The findings highlight the challenges of deploying DL models in real-world railway environments and provide insights for improving sensor-agnostic segmentation pipelines.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ghasemlou et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a4b45b2997070ff83b5b45bhttps://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-xi-2-2026-85-2026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Multi-Context Point Cloud Dataset and Machine Learning for Railway Semantic Segmentation2024 · 20 citations
  2. 2A Review of 3D Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation Methods for Complex Railway Scenes2026
  3. 3RailDLA-Net: An Intensity-Aware Deep Local Aggregation Framework for Railway Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4A Local– Global Feature Aggregation Method for Semantic Segmentation of Lidar Point Clouds in Railway Scenarios2026
  5. 5RailPC: A large‐scale railway point cloud semantic segmentation dataset2024 · 13 citations