PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 5, 2009Health Physics16 citations

Scaled Tests and Modeling of Effluent Stack Sampling Location Mixing

View Full Paper
KRKurtis P. RecknagleSYSatoru T. YokudaMBMarcel Y. Ballinger

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

A three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics computer model was used to evaluate the mixing at a sampling system for radioactive air emissions. Researchers sought to determine whether the location would meet the criteria for uniform air velocity and contaminant concentration as prescribed in the American National Standards Institute standard, Sampling and Monitoring Releases of Airborne Radioactive Substances from the Stacks and Ducts of Nuclear Facilities. This standard requires that the sampling location be well-mixed and stipulates specific tests to verify the extent of mixing. The exhaust system for the Radiochemical Processing Laboratory was modeled with a computational fluid dynamics code to better understand the flow and contaminant mixing and to predict mixing test results. The modeled results were compared to actual measurements made at a scale-model stack and to the limited data set for the full-scale facility stack. Results indicated that the computational fluid dynamics code provides reasonable predictions for velocity, cyclonic flow, gas, and aerosol uniformity, although the code predicts greater improvement in mixing as the injection point is moved farther away from the sampling location than is actually observed by measurements. In expanding from small to full scale, the modeled predictions for full-scale measurements show similar uniformity values as in the scale model. This work indicated that a computational fluid dynamics code can be a cost-effective aid in designing or retrofitting a facility's stack sampling location that will be required to meet standard ANSI/HPS N13.1-1999.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Recknagle et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a4d11f06b93d0f4f4cdb0d0https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hp.0000333680.18803.8a
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Numerical study of influence of inlet turbulence parameters on turbulence intensity in the flow domain: Incompressible flow in pipe system2007 · 14 citations
  2. 2A GENERIC-TEE-PLENUM MIXING SYSTEM FOR APPLICATION TO SINGLE POINT AEROSOL SAMPLING IN STACKS AND DUCTS2006 · 5 citations
  3. 3Analysis of Percent On-Cell Reformation of Methane in SOFC Stacks and the Effects on Thermal, Electrical, and Mechanical Performance2007 · 8 citations
  4. 4GAS MIXING FOR ACHIEVING SUITABLE CONDITIONS FOR SINGLE POINT AEROSOL SAMPLING IN A STRAIGHT TUBE: EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL RESULTS2003 · 12 citations
  5. 5NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF TURBULENT FLOW IN SMALL-ANGLE DIFFUSERS AND CONTRACTIONS USING A NEW WALL TREATMENT AND A LINEAR HIGH REYNOLDSk–ε MODEL2004 · 5 citations