PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 21, 2015Journal of Applied Physiology146 citations

Intermittent hypoxia and neurorehabilitation

View Full Paper
EGElisa J. Gonzalez‐RothiKLKun‐Ze LeeEDErica A. Dale

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In recent years, it has become clear that brief, repeated presentations of hypoxia i.e., acute intermittent hypoxia (AIH) can boost the efficacy of more traditional therapeutic strategies in certain cases of neurologic dysfunction. This hypothesis derives from a series of studies in animal models and human subjects performed over the past 35 yr. In 1980, Millhorn et al. (Millhorn DE, Eldridge FL, Waldrop TG. Respir Physiol 41: 87-103, 1980) showed that electrical stimulation of carotid chemoafferent neurons produced a persistent, serotonin-dependent increase in phrenic motor output that outlasts the stimulus for more than 90 min (i.e., a "respiratory memory"). AIH elicits similar phrenic "long-term facilitation" (LTF) by a mechanism that requires cervical spinal serotonin receptor activation and de novo protein synthesis. From 2003 to present, a series of studies demonstrated that AIH can induce neuroplasticity in the injured spinal cord, causing functional recovery of breathing capacity after cervical spinal injury. Subsequently, it was demonstrated that repeated AIH (rAIH) can induce recovery of limb function, and the functional benefits of rAIH are greatest when paired with task-specific training. Since uncontrolled and/or prolonged intermittent hypoxia can elicit pathophysiology, a challenge of intermittent hypoxia research is to ensure that therapeutic protocols are well below the threshold for pathogenesis. This is possible since many low dose rAIH protocols have induced functional benefits without evidence of pathology. We propose that carefully controlled rAIH is a safe and noninvasive modality that can be paired with other neurorehabilitative strategies including traditional activity-based physical therapy or cell-based therapies such as intraspinal transplantation of neural progenitors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gonzalez‐Rothi et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a4d3bb38719439d4beab96fhttps://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00235.2015
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Fos-like protein is induced in neurons of the medulla oblongata after stimulation of the carotid sinus nerve in awake and anesthetized rats1991 · 181 citations
  2. 2The Impact of Spinal Cord Injury on Female Sexuality, Menstruation and Pregnancy: A Review of the Literature1991 · 57 citations
  3. 3Enhanced Proliferation, Survival, and Dopaminergic Differentiation of CNS Precursors in Lowered Oxygen2000 · 712 citations
  4. 4Immunomodulation with intrathymic grafts or anti-lymphocyte serum promotes long-term intraspinal allograft survival1996 · 6 citations
  5. 5Repetitive Intermittent Hypoxia Induces Respiratory and Somatic Motor Recovery after Chronic Cervical Spinal Injury2012 · 209 citations