PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 8, 2026Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies0 citations

Mediating Universality: Latin American dependency theory in the South Korean social formation debate of the 1980s

View Full Paper
YCYoungkyun Choi

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how Latin American dependency theory influenced South Korean Marxist discourse from the late 1970s to the mid-1980s.
  • Analysed theoretical disputes within the South Korean Left during the mid-1980s.
  • Examined key participants’ interventions and the adaptation of dependency theory during this period.
  • Explored the effects of the 1980 Gwangju Uprising on Marxist political economy.
  • Dependency theory became a central reference point in debates on the historical character of Korean capitalism.
  • The analysis highlights the tensions between Marxist universality and non-European historical contexts.
  • Reframed dependency theory as a vital and ongoing influence in South Korean Marxist discourse.

Abstract

This article examines the reception of Latin American dependency theory in South Korea from the late 1970s through the mid-1980s, a rare case of East–South circulation of critical theory. Focusing on the South Korean social formation debate – a series of intense theoretical disputes that structured Marxist discourse within the Left during the mid-1980s – the article analyses how dependency theory was introduced, adapted, and criticised at a moment when Marxist political economy was being consolidated as a dominant theoretical framework after the 1980 Gwangju Uprising. Tracing the interventions of several key participants in both the early reception of Latin American dependency theory later debate, the article shows how it served as a central conceptual reference through which competing positions reassessed the historical character of Korean capitalism. The article thus reframes Latin American dependency theory not as a failed or superseded approach, but as a constitutive element of South Korean Marxist discourse whose tensions illuminate broader problems of Marxist universality and non-European historical experience.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Youngkyun Choi (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a4de93fd2ea289ef6283744https://doi.org/10.1080/13569325.2026.2677871
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper