PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 10, 2026Journal of Clinical Ultrasound1 citations

Abdominopelvic Actinomycosis Mimicking Malignant Tumors: Two Case Reports

View Full Paper
QRQuanlin RenTTT R Tian静杨静秋 杨

Key Points

  • This report aims to distinguish abdominopelvic actinomycosis from malignant tumors using clinical and imaging features.
  • Retrospective review of two confirmed cases of abdominopelvic actinomycosis by surgical pathology.
  • Analysis of clinical presentations, imaging characteristics (ultrasound, MRI, CT), and pathological results.
  • Focus on key differentiating features to avoid unnecessary surgeries.
  • Both patients had non-specific symptoms and imaging suggesting malignancy, showing ill-defined masses with RI 0.63-0.70.
  • Postoperative pathology confirmed actinomycosis with microabscesses and adhesions.
  • Good outcomes were noted with no recurrence during follow-up.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Abdominopelvic actinomycosis is a rare chronic suppurative granulomatous infection that often mimics malignant tumors on imaging, leading to preoperative misdiagnosis and unnecessary radical surgery. This report aims to highlight key clinical and imaging features that can aid in differentiating this entity from malignancy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed two cases of abdominopelvic actinomycosis confirmed by surgical pathology. Clinical presentations, laboratory findings, imaging characteristics (ultrasound, MRI, and CT), and pathological results were analyzed. RESULTS: Both patients presented with non-specific symptoms (abdominal dull pain/distension). Imaging revealed ill-defined, irregular heterogeneous masses with moderate-to-high resistance flow on ultrasound (RI 0.63-0.70) and no ascites. One case had a history of cesarean section; the other long-term intrauterine device (IUD) use (20 years). Preoperative imaging suggested malignancy, but postoperative pathology confirmed actinomycosis with inflammatory adhesions, microabscess formation, and reactive lymph nodes. Both patients underwent surgical resection with good outcomes and no recurrence during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Abdominopelvic actinomycosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of pelvic masses, especially in women with IUD use or abdominal surgery history. Key differentiating features include moderate-to-high resistance flow, absence of ascites, internal cystic changes (microabscesses), and infiltrative changes due to adhesions rather than destructive invasion. In selected diagnostically challenging cases, preoperative core needle biopsy may help avoid unnecessary extensive surgery; however, surgery remains indicated when malignancy is strongly suspected or complications are present.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ren et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a508b966eeac72a437a031ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.70329
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Pelvic actinomycosis masquerading as sigmoid cancer: an unusual cause of closed-loop small bowel obstruction2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2Cross-Sectional Imaging of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease: Diagnostic Pearls and Pitfalls on CT and MR2025 · 7 citations
  3. 3Pelvic abscess associated with Actinomyces species ‒ a rare post-cesarean complication2022 · 2 citations
  4. 4Pelvic actinomycosis: A hidden threat mimicking pelvic tumors2024 · 3 citations
  5. 5Pelvic actinomycosis2021 · 22 citations