PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 10, 2026Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners0 citations

A Spanish-language educational intervention to enhance diabetes outcomes among existing continuous glucose monitor users in a federally qualified health care center

View Full Paper
MTMarielle TavaresKKKatayoun KhoshbinWSWalter Solorzano

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a culturally tailored educational intervention on diabetes outcomes in Spanish-speaking adults with pre-existing continuous glucose monitor use.
  • Single-arm pilot study involving 20 Spanish-speaking adults with type 2 diabetes and established CGM use.
  • Participants attended a one-time educational session in Spanish, followed by brief post-session support.
  • Primary outcomes assessed included glycemic control at 3 months and secondary outcomes included CGM-derived metrics and patient-reported measures.
  • HbA1c declined by 0.33% (p = .17), showing no significant change.
  • Time in range increased by 11.4% (p = .03).
  • Time in hyperglycemia decreased by 8.7% (p < .001), with no increase in hypoglycemia.

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Latinx adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) experience worse glycemic outcomes. Although continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) improve glycemic control, benefits often plateau after early adoption, and evidence is limited regarding post-initiation CGM-focused interventions. We conducted a single-arm pilot study among Spanish-speaking adults with T2D who were established CGM users at a federally qualified health center. Participants completed a one-time, culturally tailored CGM-focused educational session delivered in Spanish, with brief post-session follow-up support. Primary outcomes included glycemic control at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included CGM-derived metrics and patient-reported measures of glucose monitoring satisfaction, diabetes distress, and empowerment. Twenty participants (mean CGM use 16.5 months) completed the intervention. HbA1c declined but not significantly (-0.33%, p = .17). Significant improvements were observed in time in range (+11.4%, p = .03) and time in hyperglycemia (-8.7%, p < .001), without increases in hypoglycemia. Participants reported improved glucose monitoring satisfaction and reduced diabetes distress. Empowerment improved immediately post-intervention but was not sustained at 3 months. In conclusion, a culturally informed CGM-focused educational intervention was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in glycemic patterns and psychosocial outcomes among Spanish-speaking Latinx adults with long-standing CGM use, supporting its potential role in enhancing post-initiation CGM engagement and addressing disparities in diabetes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tavares et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a508cc46eeac72a437a09c7https://doi.org/10.1097/jxx.0000000000001322
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Use of Diabetes Technologies and Retinopathy in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes2024 · 18 citations
  2. 2Culturally Competent Diabetes Self-Management Education for Mexican Americans2002 · 443 citations
  3. 3The Impact of Self-Regulation Education Combined with Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) on Diabetes Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Study2025 · 6 citations
  4. 4The Relationship of Hemoglobin A1C to Time-in-Range in Patients with Diabetes2018 · 471 citations
  5. 5Association of Patient-Physician Language Concordance and Glycemic Control for Limited–English Proficiency Latinos With Type 2 Diabetes2017 · 199 citations