PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 10, 2026ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Estimation of surface nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) using TEMPO satellite data and machine learning

NKNeda KolahiCACostas ArmenakisMGMark Gordon

Key Points

  • This research aims to estimate surface-level nitrogen dioxide concentrations using satellite data and machine learning.
  • Utilized TEMPO satellite observations for nitrogen dioxide estimation
  • Employed a random forest regression model trained on tropospheric NO2 vertical column density and boundary layer height
  • Achieved a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.84 with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.703 ppb.
  • Model predicted surface-level NO2 concentrations accurately with an R2 of 0.84
  • Root mean square error (RMSE) was 1.703 ppb, indicating strong predictive performance
  • Mean absolute error (MAE) was 0.939 ppb, supporting reliable air quality evaluations.

Abstract

Abstract. Air pollutants such as nitrogen dioxide (NO2) have detrimental effects on human health and ecosystems. It is therefore very crucial to pinpoint the location of high pollutant concentrations over large areas. Ground-based stations, while offering continuous temporal measurements, cannot provide broader spatial coverage for regions like cities. This study uses Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring Pollution (TEMPO) satellite observations and a machine learning model to estimate high-resolution surface-level NO2 concentrations over the Greater Toronto Area (GTA), Ontario, Canada. The random forest regression model was trained with input parameters such as hourly tropospheric NO2 vertical column density (VCD) values and boundary layer height (BLH), which are the two most effective parameters in feature importance. The model achieved a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.84, a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.703 ppb, and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.939 ppb, indicating strong and reliable predictive performance. The findings of this research can support air quality forecasting, public health studies, and urban planning decisions, especially in regions with scarce ground-based pollutant data.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kolahi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a508d096eeac72a437a0b84https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-xi-3-2026-157-2026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper