PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 10, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Leveraging a vendor-neutral deep learning reconstruction algorithm to reduce scan time and enhance image quality in T2-weighted liver MRI

BJBoryeong JeongSKSeung‐seob Kim

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the impact of a vendor-neutral deep learning reconstruction algorithm on the image quality and scan time of T2-weighted MRI for the liver.
  • Retrospective study involving 86 patients undergoing nonenhanced 3-T liver MRI.
  • Comparison of three MRI protocols: Routine-2BH, SwiftMR-1BH, and SwiftMR-2BH.
  • Assessment of image quality using quantitative SNR and qualitative characteristics by two radiologists.
  • Both SwiftMR-1BH and SwiftMR-2BH protocols achieved significantly higher sharpness and SNR compared to Routine-2BH (p < 0.001).
  • SwiftMR-1BH displayed significantly lower spatial mismatch scores than both Routine-2BH and SwiftMR-2BH (p < 0.05).
  • Lesion conspicuity was generally higher with SwiftMR protocols among patients with focal liver lesions.

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluated whether a vendor-neutral deep learning reconstruction (DLR) can improve image quality in accelerated T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) of the liver MRI acquired in a single breath-hold compared with routine T2WI. In this retrospective study, 86 patients who underwent nonenhanced 3-T liver MRI in August 2024 were included. Two board-certified radiologists independently assessed T2WI obtained using three protocols: (1) routine T2WI acquired with two breath-holds (Routine-2BH); (2) accelerated T2WI reconstructed with DLR acquired in a single breath-hold (SwiftMR-1BH); and (3) accelerated T2WI reconstructed with DLR acquired with two breath-holds (SwiftMR-2BH). Quantitative signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and qualitative image quality, including sharpness, motion artifacts, spatial mismatch, and lesion conspicuity, were evaluated. The SwiftMR protocols reduced acquisition time by approximately 9 s compared with the routine protocol. Compared with Routine-2BH protocol, both SwiftMR protocols showed significantly higher sharpness and SNR ( p < 0.001), although motion artifacts were more pronounced. Spatial mismatch scores were significantly lower with SwiftMR-1BH than with Routine-2BH and SwiftMR-2BH ( p < 0.05). Among 49 patients with focal liver lesions, lesion conspicuity was generally higher with SwiftMR protocols, although not consistently significant. Overall, vendor-neutral DLR using SwiftMR restored the image quality of accelerated single-breath-hold T2WI for liver MRI, resulting in a higher SNR and overall image quality than routine two-breath-hold T2WI.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jeong et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a508da76eeac72a437a1037https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-60802-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Accelerated T2WI for Liver MRI with Deep Learning Reconstruction: A Prospective Comparison on Image Quality and Respiration Factors2025
  2. 2Accelerated Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Liver at 1.5 T With Deep Learning–Based Image Reconstruction: Impact on Image Quality and Lesion Detection2024 · 7 citations
  3. 3Deep learning reconstruction for liver T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging:Improvement of image quality and lesion delineation2024
  4. 4Deep learning-enhanced super-resolution diffusion-weighted liver MRI: improved image quality, diagnostic performance, and acceleration2025 · 6 citations
  5. 5Qualitative and quantitative assessment of accelerated liver diffusion-weighted imaging using deep-learning reconstruction in oncologic patients2025