PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 11, 2026International Journal of Drug Policy0 citationsOpen Access

Redefining the real problem in psychedelic trials: Why fighting the Lessebo matters more than blinding integrity

View Full Paper
LVLaetitia VanderijstJFJean‐Luc FaillieTMThibault Mura

Key Points

  • This research examines the significance of managing disappointment rather than focusing solely on blinding integrity in psychedelic trials.
  • Analyzed challenges of blinding integrity in psychedelic trials and compared them to general randomized trials.
  • Discussed the concept of lessebo and its implications for patient-reported outcomes and clinical management.
  • Proposed strategies including psychoeducation and strengthening therapeutic alliances to mitigate disappointment in treatment.
  • Identified that imperfect blinding is common in randomized trials, not just psychedelics.
  • Highlighted that lessebo may arise more from disappointment than from mere pre-treatment expectations.
  • Proposed concrete strategies that may enhance ethical rigor and interpretability in psychedelic trials.

Abstract

Imperfect blinding is not specific to psychedelic trials. In randomized trials, treatment allocation is frequently correctly guessed, yet blinding integrity is rarely assessed outside of psychedelic research and is generally not considered a barrier in regulatory evaluation. The intense debate in psychedelics may reflect a broader double standard affecting mental health research, when uncertainties arising from imperfect blinding are confounded by those linked to patient-reported outcome measures. Indeed, people living with mental disorders are often viewed as unreliable reporters, despite well-documented limitations of clinician-rated scales and the absence of robust biological markers of symptomatic change. Importantly, it is the maintenance of reasonable doubt of treatment allocation that sustains internal validity and ethical feasibility of placebo-controlled designs, rather than perfect blinding. Concerns about expectancy bias in psychedelic trials are closely tied to blinding debates. When allocation is inferred, expectations may cluster in the arm perceived as active or in stereotyped experiences and influence outcomes differently in active and control arms, leading to a risk of lessebo, a negative placebo effect due to the negative expectation related to receiving a placebo. However, we argue that an underrecognized mechanism of lessebo is disappointment. This risk may reflect insufficient clinical management of disappointment rather than pre-treatment expectation alone. We therefore propose shifting the emphasis from preserving inevitably imperfect blinding towards mitigating disappointment in both arms. Establishing non-stereotyped expectations prior to treatment through structured psychoeducation, strengthened therapeutic alliance, and realistic preparation would help avoid lessebo effects. Such strategies would enhance ethical rigor, interpretability, and the clinical usefulness of psychedelic trials.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vanderijst et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a51dd5ac18d7f28ca4fff04https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2026.105423
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Zalsupindole is a Nondissociative, Nonhallucinogenic Neuroplastogen with Therapeutic Effects Comparable to Ketamine and Psychedelics2025 · 10 citations
  2. 2Single Treatment With MM120 (Lysergide) in Generalized Anxiety Disorder2025 · 30 citations
  3. 3Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study2008 · 2,573 citations
  4. 4A transdiagnostic dimensional approach towards a neuropsychological assessment for addiction: an international Delphi consensus study2018 · 238 citations
  5. 5Why Are Randomization and Placebos Included in Many Cancer Trials?2021 · 2 citations