PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 21, 2004European Heart Journal112 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of echocardiography and plasma B-type natriuretic peptide for monitoring the response to treatment in acute heart failure

View Full Paper
AGAndrzej GackowskiRIRichard IsnardJGJean Louis Golmard

Key Result

A decrease in plasma BNP >10% at day 2 predicted significantly fewer 60-day adverse outcomes compared to patients without this decrease (19% vs 65%, p<0.0001).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=95)

Structured PICO

Does serial BNP measurement provide better prognostic information than repetitive echocardiography for monitoring treatment response in patients admitted with acute heart failure?

P
Population
95 consecutive patients admitted with acute heart failure, followed for 60 days to assess the prognostic value of BNP and echocardiography.
E
Exposure
Serial B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) measurements (on admission, after 24 hours of intravenous treatment, and at day 7)
C
Comparator
Repetitive Doppler echocardiography examination (on admission, after 24 hours, and at day 7)
O
Outcome
60-day adverse outcome (composite of death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, urgent heart transplantation, or readmission)composite

Serial BNP measurements during acute heart failure treatment provide superior incremental prognostic information for 60-day outcomes compared to repetitive echocardiographic examinations.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 19% vs 65%

p-value: p=<0.0001

Abstract

AIMS: Comparison of the value of echocardiography and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in monitoring response to treatment in patients admitted for acute heart failure (HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Ninety-five consecutive patients admitted with acute HF underwent bedside Doppler echocardiography and BNP measurements on admission, after 24 h of intravenous treatment, and at day 7. We then studied the association between the clinical status, the Doppler echocardiographic findings, the BNP measurements and subsequent 60-day adverse outcome (death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, urgent heart transplantation, readmission). On admission and during hospitalisation, relationships were found between plasma BNP and Doppler echocardiographic findings, and between their changes. During a 60 day follow-up, 37 events occurred. Multivariable analysis taking into account clinical factors, Doppler echocardiography and BNP showed that the two best models to predict outcome were (1) early evaluation at day 2 (previous CHF treatment, dobutamine use, relative BNP change during first 24 h) and (2) late evaluation at day 7 (previous CHF treatment, dobutamine use, BNP at day 7). Patients with a decrease in plasma BNP >10% at day 2, or with plasma BNP <300 pg/ml at day 7 had a better outcome than the others (19% versus 65% and 16% versus 72% events, respectively, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Serial BNP measurements during the treatment of acute HF provide incremental prognostic information over clinical presentation and repetitive echocardiographic examination.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gackowski et al. (2004) conducted a cohort in acute heart failure (n=95). Decrease in plasma BNP >10% at day 2 vs. No decrease in plasma BNP >10% at day 2 was evaluated on 60-day adverse outcome (death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, urgent heart transplantation, readmission) (p=<0.0001). A decrease in plasma BNP >10% at day 2 predicted significantly fewer 60-day adverse outcomes compared to patients without this decrease (19% vs 65%, p<0.0001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a557e1b104eb60be60852cchttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehj.2004.07.038
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper