PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 14, 2026Cardiovascular Diabetology0 citationsOpen Access

Cardiovascular outcomes of empagliflozin-GLP-1RA combination therapy in type 2 diabetes: EMPRISE study

View Full Paper
PHPHYO T. HTOOHCHanseul ChoJPJulie M. Paik

Key Points

  • To evaluate the cardiovascular outcomes of empagliflozin-GLP-1RA combination therapy in adults with type 2 diabetes.
  • Conducted a cohort study using US healthcare databases (2013–2022).
  • Compared outcomes in patients initiating empagliflozin first with either GLP-1RA or DPP-4i, and those starting GLP-1RA first with either empagliflozin or sulfonylureas.
  • Estimated hazard ratios and rate differences per 1,000 person-years with adjustments for over 130 baseline covariates.
  • Empagliflozin-GLP-1RA combination had a lower risk of MACE (HR: 0.81; RD: -3.7).
  • Lower HHF-mortality risk with empagliflozin-GLP-1RA (HR: 0.61; RD: -6.6) compared to empagliflozin-DPP-4i initiators.
  • Combining GLP-1RA with empagliflozin rather than sulfonylureas resulted in lower MACE (HR: 0.68; RD: -5.3) and HHF-mortality (HR: 0.62; RD: -3.7).

Abstract

Abstract Background Evidence on the cardiovascular benefits of combining empagliflozin with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) is limited, derived primarily from indirect comparisons or subgroup analyses of cardiovascular outcome trials. Methods We conducted a cohort study emulating two comparative effectiveness trials using US healthcare databases (2013–2022), including federal Medicare and commercial claims data (Optum Clinformatics and MarketScan). Among adults with type 2 diabetes in routine care, we compared cardiovascular outcomes in patients initiating: (i) empagliflozin first, followed by augmentation with either GLP-1RA or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), and (ii) GLP-1RA first, followed by augmentation with either empagliflozin or sulfonylureas. Primary outcomes were modified major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality) and a composite of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) or all-cause mortality. We estimated hazard ratios (HR) and rate differences (RD) per 1,000 person-years with 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for over 130 baseline covariates using propensity score matching weights. Results Compared with empagliflozin-DPP-4i initiators, empagliflozin-GLP-1RA was associated with lower risk of MACE HR: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.97); RD: -3.7 (-7.1, -0.2) and lower HHF-mortality HR: 0.61 (0.48, 0.77); RD: -6.6 (-9.3, -3.9). Compared with the GLP-1RA-sulfonylurea combination, the GLP-1RA-empagliflozin combination had lower risks of MACE HR: 0.68 (0.56, 0.81); RD: -5.3 (-7.9, -2.6) and HHF-mortality HR: 0.62 (0.51, 0.76); RD: -3.7 (-6.1, -1.8). Conclusions In US clinical practice, adding GLP-1RA to empagliflozin was associated with lower risks of MACE and HHF-mortality compared with adding DPP-4i. Among GLP-1RA initiators, adding empagliflozin was associated with lower cardiovascular risk than adding sulfonylureas, supporting potential additive cardiovascular benefits of GLP-1RA-empagliflozin combination therapy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

HTOO et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a55d11a5aafca87247f824bhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-026-03287-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper