PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 14, 2026Computer Assisted Language Learning0 citations

Engagement without attainment? Exploring AI-assisted language learning through SLA theories

View Full Paper
MIMurod IsmailovYOYuichi OnoTCThomas K. F. Chiu

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the role of interactive AI tools in enhancing learner engagement and vocabulary awareness in second language acquisition.
  • Examined four Google AI tools (Quick Draw, XYZ Toy, Say What You See, GenChess) with 64 Japanese university students over two semesters.
  • Utilized a hybrid deductive-inductive coding approach to analyze student reflections.
  • Focused on core theories of second language acquisition (SLA) to guide the analysis.
  • The tools enhanced learner engagement and vocabulary awareness among participants.
  • Peer interactions were fostered but often lacked depth, remaining predictable and surface-level.
  • Adaptive feedback and spontaneous negotiation of meaning were limited, requiring improved pedagogical design.

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in second language acquisition (SLA), yet its pedagogical value remains contested. While most research focuses on mainstream chatbots, less is known about interactive AI tools that could be used for active, task-based learning. This study examined four experimental Google AI tools (Quick Draw, XYZ Toy, Say What You See, and GenChess) through core SLA theories. Sixty-four Japanese university students used the tools over two semesters, and their reflections were analyzed through a hybrid deductive-inductive coding approach. The findings suggest that the tools supported learner engagement and vocabulary awareness. They also created opportunities for peer interaction, although such interactions were often predictable and remained close to the surface of language learning. Deeper linguistic processing was also limited, as the tools rarely generated adaptive feedback or spontaneous negotiation of meaning. The study highlights the need for careful teacher mediation and learner agency when using such tools. It also shows that an AI-assisted approach requires careful pedagogical design if it is to support meaningful language learning.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ismailov et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a55d11a5aafca87247f82c6https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2026.2699241
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Exploratory study of an AI-supported discussion representational tool for online collaborative learning in a Chinese university2024 · 32 citations
  2. 2Transforming language education: A systematic review of AI-powered chatbots for English as a foreign language speaking practice2024 · 164 citations
  3. 3Enhancing data analysis and programming skills through structured prompt training: The impact of generative AI in engineering education2025 · 41 citations
  4. 4Teachers' and students' perceptions of AI-generated concept explanations: Implications for integrating generative AI in computer science education2024 · 40 citations
  5. 5Technologies and Sociomaterial Tensions in the Second Language Classroom2025 · 1 citations