PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 14, 2026International Journal of Dental Hygiene0 citationsOpen Access

What Is the Clinical Periodontal Condition of Patients With Diabetes Mellitus as Compared to Those Without?—A Synthesis of Systematic Reviews

View Full Paper
LWLotte P. M. WeijdijkGWG.A. van der WeijdenSAShabnam Asadi

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the clinical periodontal condition of diabetes mellitus patients compared to those without diabetes.
  • Systematic reviews were identified through MEDLINE-PubMed and the Cochrane Library searches.
  • Seven systematic reviews were included, covering 154 underlying clinical studies.
  • Clinical attachment level and probing pocket depth were the primary outcome parameters evaluated.
  • For clinical attachment level, differences were small to substantial for type I diabetes, and substantial for type II.
  • Probing pocket depth showed zero to moderate differences for type I, and moderate to substantial for type II.
  • Secondary parameters, including gingival inflammation and recession, showed weak evidence.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Focused Question What is the clinical periodontal condition of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) as compared to those without DM (NDM) as gathered from existing systematic reviews (SRs)? Methods MEDLINE‐PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception through September 2024 to identify eligible studies. SRs evaluating the periodontal condition of periodontitis patients with DM versus NDM were included. The primary outcome parameters of interest were Clinical Attachment level/loss (CAL) and Probing Pocket Depth (PPD). The secondary outcome were parameters of gingival inflammation, plaque and gingival recession. Characteristics, data and conclusions as presented in the selected SRs were extracted. The potential risk of bias was estimated, and a citation analysis was performed. The emerging evidence was summarized and grated. Results The search resulted in 488 unique titles and abstracts. After full text reading seven SRs were eligible for inclusion involving all together 154 underlying clinical studies. Of these 79 studies involved DM type I, 50 DM type II, 23 both types of DM and 2 studies without specification. For CAL the magnitude of the difference was estimated to be small to substantial for DM I and substantial for DM II and I/II. For PPD, the differences were estimated to be zero to moderate for DM I, moderate to substantial for DM II, and small to substantial for DM I/II. Conclusion Regarding the impact of DM on periodontitis parameters, there is a moderate certainty for a small to substantial difference on CAL and zero to substantial difference for PPD as compared to NDM. There is weak evidence regarding the secondary parameters.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Weijdijk et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a55d11a5aafca87247f8336https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.70109
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper