PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 14, 2026European Geriatric Medicine1 citationsOpen Access

Integration of geriatric assessment-guided care plan modifications and interventions into clinical paths of older adults with cancer (GORILLA): a feasibility approach

RMRea Sujin MaylandMDMerlin DeterdingFVFilippo Maria Verri

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the feasibility of integrating comprehensive geriatric assessments into routine care for older adults with cancer.
  • Conducted a bicentric feasibility trial in Germany (DRKS00035569) for patients ≥ 65 with positive geriatric screening.
  • Implemented a comprehensive geriatric assessment followed by a multidisciplinary tumor board review.
  • Assessed clinician feedback on the added value of presenting CGA results during treatment discussions.
  • 75 patients received CGA, with 72 (96%) agreeing to participate in the trial (95% CI: [0.8875; 0.9917]).
  • Primary endpoint of estimating willingness to participate was achieved with an accuracy of ± 7.5%.
  • A geriatric team member attended two-thirds of MDT meetings, with clinicians rating CGA integration as predominantly useful.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) followed by geriatric assessment-guided interventions was demonstrated to reduce treatment-related toxicities CTCAE III°–V° in older adults with cancer undergoing systemic cancer treatments, but implementation remains insufficient. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of implementing CGA into routine care and multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTs) in Germany within a bicentric feasibility trial (DRKS00035569; 19.12.2024). Methods Patients ≥ 65 years with positive geriatric screening (G8 < 15 points) and all patients ≥ 70 years received CGA as part of their routine care. Results were presented during MDT discussions to derive treatment recommendations. After CGA, patients were asked for trial participation which included data analysis and a telephone follow-up after 3 months. Clinicians participating in the MDT were asked about the added value of CGA presentation. Primary endpoint was the estimation of patient’s willingness to participate with an accuracy of ± 7.5% to inform design for a later (cost) effectiveness trial. Results 75 patients received CGA (62.5% females). Of those, 72 (96%) agreed to participate (95% confidence interval, 0.8875; 0.9917). With an accuracy of estimating the willingness to participate of < |7.5%|, the primary endpoint was reached. The median age was 76.7 years (range 69–92 years). A member of the geriatric team attended 2/3 of MDT meetings. Clinicians rated the integration of CGA results predominantly as useful. Conclusion Integration of CGA into routine care of older cancer patients is feasible but will likely require adequate geriatric staffing per center. A larger implementation study, evaluating efficacy and cost-effectiveness in the German healthcare system, is necessary.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mayland et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a55d11a5aafca87247f839fhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-026-01542-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper