PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 14, 2026Journal of Forecasting0 citationsOpen Access

A New Implementation of Network GARCH Model for Stock Volatility and Co‐Volatility Forecasting

View Full Paper
PZPeiyi Zhou

Key Points

  • To develop a generalized network GARCH model within the DCC framework for enhanced volatility forecasting.
  • Introduced DCC-GNGARCH model embedding GARCH dynamics in GNAR framework.
  • Applied model to 75 active US stocks using constructed network for volatility estimation.
  • Parameter estimation utilized squared returns and negative log-likelihood optimization.
  • DCC-GNGARCH effectively captures volatility clustering and spillovers.
  • Model showed valid performance in simulating financial return series.
  • Robustness checks confirmed stability across various network constructions and parameters.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Volatility clustering and spillovers are key features of financial time series with many cross‐sectional assets. While network analysis links similar or correlated stocks and helps trace volatility spillovers, contemporary multivariate ARCH‐GARCH formulations struggle to represent structured network dependence and remain parsimonious. We introduce the generalized network GARCH model under the DCC framework (DCC‐GNGARCH), that embeds the GARCH dynamics within the generalized network autoregressive (GNAR) framework to capture an asset's volatility driven by its own history and by neighboring assets in a constructed network. DCC‐GNGARCH also extends existing network GARCH formulations by adapting neighboring volatility persistence, dynamic conditional covariance updates, and allowing higher order neighboring effects beyond immediate neighbors. This paper provides the model derivation, vectorization and conversion, and an extension by incorporating threshold coefficients to capture leverage effects. We show that the DCC‐GNGARCH is a valid volatility model satisfying the stylized facts of financial return series through simulation. Parameter estimation is then performed by using squared returns as variance proxy and minimizing the negative log‐likelihood (NLL) loss function. We apply our model on 75 of the most active US stocks under a constructed network and highlight the model's ability in volatility estimation and forecast, whereas robustness checks under alternative network constructions, different proxy choices, error specifications, and sparsity levels confirm the stability of the main empirical findings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Peiyi Zhou (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a55d1475aafca87247f8485https://doi.org/10.1002/for.70191
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation1982 · 20,873 citations
  2. 2Multivariate Simultaneous Generalized ARCH1995 · 4,589 citations
  3. 3Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series With a Unit Root1979 · 9,193 citations
  4. 4Spurious regressions in econometrics1974 · 6,246 citations
  5. 5Multivariate Time Series Analysis and Its Applications2010 · 6 citations