PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 14, 2026International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Mental Health Research and Psychometric Properties: A Systematic Review

AAAl Muhannad Khalifa Saif AljahwariTKTengku Sarina Aini Tengku KasimFAFareed Awae

Key Points

  • This review aims to evaluate the development and validation of mental health assessment tools while identifying current research gaps.
  • Conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines.
  • Analyzed 35 studies identified from a comprehensive search of 6,255 records in the Scopus database.
  • Examined theoretical frameworks, instruments used, and statistical methodologies for validity and reliability.
  • Advanced statistical techniques are increasingly utilized, including Item Response Theory and Structural Equation Modeling.
  • Culturally and contextually adapted instruments show a positive trend in recent research.
  • Significant gaps remain in validating tools for marginalized populations and in incorporating digital assessment methods.

Abstract

HRMARS - Over the past three years, research on mental health and psychometric properties has grown substantially, reflecting an increasing acknowledgment of mental health as a central pillar of individual well-being and societal resilience. This systematic review integrates findings from empirical studies published between 2022 and 2024, focusing on the development, adaptation, and validation of mental health assessment tools. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search of the Scopus database identified 6,255 records, of which 35 studies met the inclusion criteria for detailed analysis. The review explores the theoretical frameworks that inform recent psychometric research, commonly utilized instruments, and the statistical methodologies adopted to ensure validity and reliability. Results demonstrate a clear progression characterized by the increasing use of advanced statistical techniques such as Item Response Theory, multi-group Confirmatory Factor Analysis, and Structural Equation Modeling alongside a shift toward culturally and contextually adapted instruments. Although progress has been made, persistent gaps remain, including the limited validation of tools for marginalized populations, underrepresentation of non-Western cultural contexts, and insufficient integration of digital assessment methods. Bridging these gaps requires the development of culturally responsive, technologically innovative, and theoretically grounded instruments. This review offers a thorough overview of current trends, identifies critical research gaps, and proposes future directions to improve the accuracy, inclusivity, and applicability of psychometric instruments throughout global mental health research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aljahwari et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a55d18e5aafca87247f88achttps://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v16-i7/28239
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper