PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 15, 2026Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Hearing and Balance Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Factors Impacting Screening Documentation for Obstructive Sleep-Disordered Breathing at Well-Child Visits

View Full Paper
SSSarah R. SuttonCFCaroline M. FieldsCGChristine B. San Giovanni

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Background: The current literature suggests that screening for symptoms of pediatric obstructive sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is low despite guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics to screen all children at well visits. Specific factors that affect screening rates for snoring have not been well delineated. Materials and Methods: This study is a retrospective chart review of children ages 2–12 who presented for well-child visits at an academic hospital network. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with documentation for SDB screening. Results: Of 1001 charts reviewed, 809 children met inclusion criteria (median age 5 IQR 3–8 years, 50.3% female). Less than half (45.4%) of the children were screened for snoring, and 16.1% of those screened had symptoms of SDB. Adjusted multivariable regression showed that screening was significantly higher in older children (OR: 2.19 1.46–3.29; p < 0.001 for 5- to less than 8-year-old children; OR: 2.37 1.57–3.57; p < 0.001 for 8- to less than 12-year-old children). Children of the Other race group were also found to have significantly lower screening rates than Black and White children (OR 0.44 0.23–0.84; p = 0.014). The odds of being screened were 94% lower in visits in which a medical trainee was involved (p < 0.001). The odds of being screened at a well-child visit were 3.7 times higher in encounters in which a templated note was used (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Less than half of the children presenting for well visits were screened for snoring in this cohort. Differences in screening were attenuated by trainee involvement and the use of templated notes, which presents further avenues to explore meeting guideline recommendations for SDB screening.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sutton et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a598cbcad3d1a0cafe29d46https://doi.org/10.3390/ohbm7020025
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Examining Associations Between Neighborhood‐Level Social Vulnerability and Care for Children With Sleep‐Disordered Breathing2022 · 22 citations
  2. 2Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Utilization of Tonsillectomy among Medicaid-Insured Children2021 · 39 citations
  3. 3Impact of an Electronic Template on Documentation of Obesity in a Primary Care Clinic2015 · 22 citations
  4. 4Variation in Tonsil Size in 4- to 17-Year-old Schoolchildren2006 · 78 citations
  5. 5Snoring, Intermittent Hypoxia and Academic Performance in Primary School Children2003 · 237 citations