PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2025Science Translational Medicine16 citations

Coactivation of innate immune suppressive cells induces acquired resistance against combined TLR agonism and PD-1 blockade

View Full Paper
HNHitomi NishinakamuraSSSayoko ShinyaTITakuma Irie

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Immune checkpoint blockade therapy has been successfully applied in clinical settings as a standard therapy for many cancer types, but its clinical efficacy is restricted to patients with immunologically hot tumors. Various strategies to modify the tumor microenvironment (TME), such as Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists that can stimulate innate immunity, have been explored but have not been successful. Here, we show a mechanism of acquired resistance to combination treatment consisting of an agonist for multiple TLRs, OK-432 (Picibanil), and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade. Adding the TLR agonist failed to convert the TME from immunogenically cold to hot and did not augment antitumor immunity, particularly CD8 + T cell responses, in multiple animal models. The failure was attributed to the coactivation of innate suppressive cells, such as polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells (PMN-MDSCs) expressing CXCR2, through high CXCL1 production by macrophages in the TME upon OK-432 treatment. A triple combination treatment with OK-432, PD-1 blockade, and a CXCR2 neutralizing antibody overcame the resistance induced by PMN-MDSCs, resulting in a stronger antitumor effect than that of any dual combinations or single treatments. The accumulation of PMN-MDSCs was similarly observed in the pleural effusions of patients with lung cancer after OK-432 administration. We propose that successful combination cancer immunotherapy intended to stimulate innate antitumor immunity requires modulation of unwanted activation of innate immune suppressive cells, including PMN-MDSCs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nishinakamura et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a5bea93c79753f37d04d5c4https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.adk3160
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Antitumor activity of a systemic STING-activating non-nucleotide cGAMP mimetic2020 · 545 citations
  2. 2Dendritic cells stimulated with a bacterial product, OK-432, efficiently induce cytotoxic T lymphocytes specific to tumor rejection peptide.2003 · 112 citations
  3. 3Host STING-dependent MDSC mobilization drives extrinsic radiation resistance2017 · 489 citations
  4. 4Conditional gene targeting in macrophages and granulocytes using LysMcre mice1999 · 2,195 citations
  5. 5Oncology Meets Immunology: The Cancer-Immunity Cycle2013 · 7,068 citations