PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1992Psychophysiology42 citationsOpen Access

Modulation of Slow Cortical Potentials by Instrumentally Learned Blood Pressure Responses

View Full Paper
TEThomas ElbertLRLarry E. RobertsWLWerner Lutzenberger

Key Result

Instrumentally-learned blood pressure increases resulted in less negative slow cortical potentials compared to decreases (p<0.02), indicating relative cortical inhibition by pressor responses.

Structured PICO

Do instrumentally-learned blood pressure increases inhibit electrocortical activity in human subjects?

P
Population
14 subjects undergoing instrumentally-learned blood pressure response training.
I
Intervention
Instrumentally-learned blood pressure responses (beat-by-beat feedback for increases and decreases in mean arterial pressure)
C
Comparator
Within-subject comparison (blood pressure increase vs. decrease trials)
O
Outcome
Slow cortical potentials recorded from the midsagittal linesurrogate

Instrumentally-learned blood pressure increases lead to relative cortical inhibition, providing physiological insight into learning theories of idiopathic hypertension.

Main Result

p-value: p=<0.02

Abstract

We assessed whether instrumentally-learned pressor responses inhibit electrocortical activity, as predicted by learning theories of idiopathic hypertension. Subjects received beat-by-beat feedback for increases and decreases in mean arterial pressure measured from the finger (Peñáz method). Slow potentials were recorded from the midsagittal line during the final training session. Also recorded at this time were heart rate, eye movements, respiration, and post-session verbal reports of the subject's control strategies. Thirteen of 14 subjects differentiated blood pressure increases and decreases at p less than .05 or better during the final session (within-subject discriminative operant procedure). Slow potentials were less negative on blood pressure increase compared to decrease trials at all midsagittal sites (p less than .02), indicating relative cortical inhibition by pressor responses. This effect occurred even though subjects reported tensing of muscles on increase trials (p less than .01), a behavioral activity previously associated with augmented rather than diminished cortical negativity. On increase trials slow potentials shifted toward positivity just prior to heart rate deceleration (the latter effect confirming activation of the baroreceptors).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Elbert et al. (1992) studied this question. Instrumentally-learned blood pressure increases vs. Blood pressure decreases was evaluated on Slow cortical potentials (p=<0.02). Instrumentally-learned blood pressure increases resulted in less negative slow cortical potentials compared to decreases (p<0.02), indicating relative cortical inhibition by pressor responses.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a5d2f13289a75eadbc2715ahttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1992.tb01678.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper