PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 20, 2026Iconic Research and Engineering Journals0 citationsOpen Access

Principals’ Capacity Building Strategies and Students’ Academic Performance in Public Secondary Schools in Bungoma Central Sub-County, Kenya

MMMasika MectilidahDKDr. Simon KipkeneiDWDr. Peter Wamalwa

Key Points

  • To assess the effectiveness of principals' capacity building strategies on students' academic performance in secondary schools in Bungoma Central Sub-County.
  • Descriptive survey design targeting 11,238 respondents including principals, teachers, and students.
  • Sample of 386 respondents was selected using Cochran and Yamane’s formula at a 95% confidence level.
  • Data collected through questionnaires and interviews, achieving a 94% response rate.
  • 83.2% of respondents confirmed principals organized professional development for teachers.
  • Capacity building showed a significant positive effect on academic performance (β=0.468, t=9.649, p=0.000), explaining 21.9% of variance (R²=0.219, F=93.103, p=0.000).
  • The null hypothesis of no effect was rejected, affirming the role of capacity building in improving academic performance.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate principals’ capacity building strategies on students’ academic performance in public secondary schools in Bungoma Central Sub-County, Kenya. Persistent poor performance in the Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education (KCSE) in the sub-county, despite the emphasis placed on quality education under the National Education Sector Strategic Plan (2023-2024), prompted an inquiry into how principals’ professional development initiatives for teachers influenced learner outcomes. The study adopted a descriptive survey design anchored on the Human Relations Theory and targeted a population of 11,238 respondents comprising 47 principals, 699 teachers and 10,492 students in 47 public secondary schools. Using Cochran and Yamane’s (1967) formula at a 95% confidence level, a sample of 386 respondents was drawn, and data were collected using questionnaires and interview schedules, achieving a 94% response rate (321 respondents). Descriptive findings established that 83.2% of respondents confirmed that principals organized professional development programmes for teachers, with in-service training workshops (87.6%) and peer learning sessions (79.4%) being the most common activities, while 86.6% of respondents reported that capacity building had improved academic performance. Simple linear regression results revealed that capacity building had a statistically significant positive effect on students’ academic performance (β=0.468, t=9.649, p=0.000), explaining 21.9% of the variance in performance (R²=0.219, F=93.103, p=0.000). The null hypothesis that capacity building has no significant effect on students’ academic performance was consequently rejected. The study concluded that principals’ investment in structured, regular, and practice-oriented professional development for teachers is a critical lever for improving students’ academic achievement, and recommended that principals institutionalize termly capacity building programmes supported by adequate resources and follow-up mentorship.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mectilidah et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a5dba928bd453d3397abb24https://doi.org/10.64388/irev10i1-1719750
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper