PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2003Journal of Craniofacial Surgery50 citations

Proportion Indices in the Craniofacial Regions of 284 Healthy North American White Children Between 1 and 5 Years of Age

View Full Paper
LFLeslie G. FarkasTHTania M. HreczkoMKMarko Katić

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The study's aim was to provide the normal range data on 81 anthropometric proportion indices of the craniofacial complex, separately in boys and girls between 1 and 5 years of age, supplementary to the previously published normal proportion values of the North American white population from 6 to 18 years of age. In the first age group, 17 or 18 boys and 18 or 22 girls were measured. In each age group between 2 and 5 years old, 30 boys and 30 or 31 girls were examined. The normal values of the 81 proportion indices were established with the help of 45 measurements (7 cranial, 13 facial, 4 orbital, 12 nasal, 7 labio-oral, and 2 auricular) taken from 287 healthy children. The data on the normal indices were reported in two groups: areal and interareal. The areal proportions are formed by taking measurements from one particular craniofacial region. Proportions indicating the quality of relation of measurements taken from two craniofacial regions were classified as interareal (N = 36). The basic proportions (N = 13) of the areal one show the relation between the measurements influencing the general view of each craniofacial region. The detailed analysis of the proportionality in the individual regions, carried out with the help of the other measurements within the regions, established 36 additional areal proportion indices. The recommended method of examination is to start with the basic proportions, which offers the determination of the most and least disproportionate craniofacial region, followed by a more comprehensive search for other disproportions with the help of the additional areal proportions (N = 36) and interareal proportions (N = 32).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Farkas et al. (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a5e15f5a55bb02a34bc30d3https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200301000-00004
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Growth Patterns of the Face: A Morphometric Study1992 · 148 citations
  2. 2Growth Patterns in the Orbital Region: A Morphometric Study1992 · 102 citations
  3. 3Growth Patterns of the Nasolabial Region: A Morphometric Study1992 · 125 citations
  4. 4Growth and Development of Regional Units in the Head and Face Based on Anthropometric Measurements1992 · 116 citations
  5. 5Anthropometric Growth Study of the Ear1992 · 256 citations