MAV-MCC 4S+4T — Progressive Register of Predictions, Corroborations, and Empirical Convergences

This living preprint establishes the first versioned MAV-MCC 4S+4T register of predictions, corroborations, empirical convergences, negative results, and provenance classifications. The v1.0-R1 cutoff is 19 July 2026 and preserves 21 external publications or innovations selected because their journal release, first public appearance, or material evidentiary update fell within 1 April-19 July 2026. Nineteen C2/C3 cases form the main evidence register; two C1 supporting observations are retained in Annex A and excluded from the main count. Each case is evaluated against public MAV-MCC anchors and, where explicitly marked, archived in-chat provenance. The method separates structural ex-ante correspondence, workflow-limited prospective solution architecture (PSA-W), post-data calibration, and mechanistic overlap. It also separates independent convergence (IC), possible uptake (PU), and documented use (DU). No direct use by external authors is inferred from similarity, Zenodo views, or downloads. At this cutoff, 10 cases are C3, 9 C2, and 2 C1. COSMO-01 is conservatively classified C2; TIME-02 and CHEM-02 are Annex A observations. The strongest cases concern non-Markovian quantum-geometric memory, trainable superconducting directionality, critical states defined by coupling zeros, bicomponent liquid-water structure, relational time, water-based parallel DNA synthesis, and lossy-channel quantum teleportation. MCC-PRO is defined as a reduced operational/governance runtime derived from MAV-MCC, not a separate physical theory. External studies remain independently describable in their conventional frameworks. Aggregate operation counts are descriptive and selection-enriched, not independent statistical evidence. The release preserves negative results, including the original LHCb #67 HIGH-gate FAIL and the Request #80 PRIMARY FAIL. The permitted claim is progressive empirical corroboration of selected CORE propositions; independent prospective validation of the unified theory remains open. A cross-AI review returned internal structural consistency PASS after minor revisions; this is not peer review or scientific validation.