PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 29, 2009Obesity85 citationsOpen Access

Pericardial Fat Volume Correlates With Inflammatory Markers: The Framingham Heart Study

TTThomas M. TadrosJMJoseph M. MassaroGRGuido Aranha Rosito

Key Result

Systemic inflammatory markers, including CRP (P=0.0001) and urinary isoprostanes (P=0.02), correlated positively with intrathoracic fat volumes independent of BMI and abdominal visceral fat.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=1,175)

Structured PICO

Do systemic inflammatory and oxidative stress marker concentrations correlate with pericardial and intrathoracic fat volumes?

P
Population
1,175 participants (53% women, mean age 59 years) from the Framingham Offspring Study assessed for fat volumes and inflammatory markers.
O
Outcome
Correlation of systemic inflammatory and oxidative stress marker concentrations with pericardial and intrathoracic fat volumessurrogate

Multiple markers of inflammation and oxidative stress correlate with pericardial and intrathoracic fat volumes, extending the known association between regional adiposity and systemic inflammation.

Main Result

p-value: p=<0.0001

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine whether systemic inflammatory and oxidative stress marker concentrations correlate with pericardial and intrathoracic fat volumes. Participants of the Framingham Offspring Study (n = 1,175, 53% women, mean age 59 +/- 9 years) had pericardial and intrathoracic fat volumes assessed by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scans, and provided fasting blood and urine samples to measure concentrations of 14 inflammatory markers: C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), CD40 ligand, fibrinogen, intracellular adhesion molecule-1, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) activity and mass, myeloperoxidase, osteoprotegerin, P-selectin, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, tumor necrosis factor receptor-2, and urinary isoprostanes. Multivariable linear regression models were used to determine the association of log-transformed inflammatory marker concentrations with fat volumes, using fat volume as the dependent variable. Due to smaller sample sizes, models were rerun after adding urinary isoprostanes (n = 961) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (n = 813) to the marker panel. Upon backward elimination, four of the biomarkers correlated positively with each fat depot: CRP (P < 0.0001 for each fat depot), interleukin-6 (P < 0.05 for each fat depot), MCP-1 (P < 0.01 for each fat depot), and urinary isoprostanes (P < 0.01 for pericardial fat; P < 0.001 for intrathoracic fat). Even after adjusting for BMI, waist circumference (WC), and abdominal visceral fat, CRP (P = 0.0001) and urinary isoprostanes (P = 0.02) demonstrated significant positive associations with intrathoracic fat, but not with pericardial fat. Multiple markers of inflammation and oxidative stress correlated with pericardial and intrathoracic fat volumes, extending the known association between regional adiposity and inflammation and oxidative stress.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tadros et al. (2009) reported a cross-sectional. Systemic inflammatory and oxidative stress markers was evaluated on Correlation of inflammatory marker concentrations with pericardial and intrathoracic fat volumes (p=<0.0001). Systemic inflammatory markers, including CRP (P=0.0001) and urinary isoprostanes (P=0.02), correlated positively with intrathoracic fat volumes independent of BMI and abdominal visceral fat.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a60189e12857466faa3b415https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2009.343
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper