PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 22, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Artificial Intelligence Literacy for Teachers: A Systematic Review

View Full Paper
PSParitchaya SarakanLNLan Thi NguyenPKParama Kwangmuang

Key Points

  • This review aims to develop a comprehensive competency framework for teacher AI literacy in education.
  • Conducted a systematic review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines across four databases.
  • Analyzed 37 studies from 24 countries with over 15,520 participants after screening 1,851 records.
  • Classified competencies into three tiers: Essential, Important, and Developing based on prevalence rates.
  • Identified 17 distinct AI literacy competencies categorized by prevalence: Essential (≥70%), Important (40-69%), Developing (<40%).
  • Essential competencies included AI-Enhanced Teaching Methods (94.6%) and AI Conceptual Knowledge (91.9%).
  • Equity awareness emerged as a Developing competency at 24.3%, highlighting a critical gap.

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence in education necessitates comprehensive teacher AI literacy extending beyond traditional digital competence. However, systematic frameworks identifying essential competencies remain fragmented across contexts. This systematic review establishes an evidence-based hierarchical competency framework for teacher AI literacy development. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched four databases for peer-reviewed studies (2019-2024). After screening 1,851 records, 37 high-quality studies from 24 countries representing 15,520 participants were analyzed. We identified 17 distinct competencies classified into three evidence-based tiers: Essential competencies (≥70% prevalence) led by AI-Enhanced Teaching Methods (94.6%) and AI Conceptual Knowledge (91.9%); Important competencies (40-69%) including Professional Development (73.0%); and Developing competencies (<40%) such as Cross-disciplinary Applications (35.1%). This internationally-derived framework reveals a critical gap where equity awareness (24.3%) emerges late despite fundamental ethical importance, informing teacher education policy and curriculum design. This review was not prospectively registered. This registration is retrospective and deposits the protocol, data-extraction sheet, coding book, PRISMA 2020 checklist, and quality-appraisal records of a completed review to support transparency and reproducibility.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sarakan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a605dfa4163e025518d7e2ehttps://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/epzqj
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1AI Literacy Among Pre-Service Teachers: A New Dimension of Teacher Professional Development2026
  2. 2AI LITERACY FOR TEACHERS: OPPORTUNITIES, RISKS, AND THE DEMANDS OF MODERN SOCIETY2026
  3. 3Artificial Intelligence Literacy and Competency in Pre-Service Teacher Education2026 · 2 citations
  4. 4AI Literacy in Preservice Teachers Preparation Programs: Global Meta-Analysis2025 · 4 citations
  5. 5What are artificial intelligence literacy and competency? A comprehensive framework to support them2024 · 486 citations