PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 2007Developmental Psychology189 citations

A taxometric study of the Adult Attachment Interview.

View Full Paper
GRGlenn I. RoismanRFR. Chris FraleyJBJay Belsky

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This study is the first to examine the latent structure of individual differences reflected in the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI; C. George, N. Kaplan, & M. Main, 1985), a commonly used and well-validated measure designed to assess an adult's current state of mind regarding childhood experiences with caregivers. P. E. Meehl's (1995) taxometric methods (i.e., MAXCOV-HITMAX) were applied to data from 504 AAIs. Analyses revealed that the variation underlying secure versus dismissing states of mind was more consistent with a dimensional than a taxonic model. (Taxometric analyses of preoccupation were indeterminate.) In addition, variation in secure adults' (n=278) reports about their early experiences revealed little evidence for qualitative groups of earned- and continuous-secures. Rather, the inferred life experiences of secure adults appeared to be distributed continuously. Findings are discussed in terms of their theoretical implications regarding the phenomenon of earned-security specifically and variation underlying secure and insecure states of mind more generally. The consequences of these analyses for AAI reliability training and coding are also explored.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Roisman et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a612f43dcbd73a1130a38dchttps://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.675
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper