PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 23, 2026Journal of Neurosurgery Case Lessons0 citations

Rescue deep brain stimulation for recurrent essential tremor after ventral intermediate nucleus thalamotomy: illustrative cases

CLCuong P. LuuJPJennifer L PerraultAGAayush Goud

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of rescue deep brain stimulation (DBS) for tremor recurrence after thalamotomy in essential tremor patients.
  • Three essential tremor patients who underwent bilateral DBS after thalamotomy were observed.
  • Microelectrode recordings were analyzed to assess electrophysiological activity in lesioned versus nonlesioned VIM.
  • Rescue DBS targeting was adjusted based on earlier thalamotomy lesion locations.
  • Electrophysiological activity in thalamotomy lesions was significantly lower than in nonlesioned VIM (p = 0.0397).
  • Rescue DBS required smaller charge density increases for tremor control compared to typical stimulation settings.
  • Optimal tremor reduction was achieved with ventral VIM stimulation, while central VIM stimulation had balanced effects.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medication-refractory essential tremor (ET) patients who undergo MR-guided focused ultrasound or Gamma Knife thalamotomy may experience tremor recurrence, prompting rescue deep brain stimulation (DBS). Yet, the impact of prior ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) lesioning on DBS targeting, microelectrode recording (MER), and stimulation programming remains uncertain. OBSERVATIONS: The authors present 3 ET patients undergoing bilateral DBS for tremor recurrence after thalamotomy. Thalamotomy lesions showed depressed electrophysiological activity versus nonlesioned VIM on MER (p = 0.0397) and required smaller DBS charge density increases for tremor control, suggesting irreversible lesion effects despite tremor recurrence. Tremor recurrence correlated with lesion mislocation; specifically, ablations missed the central VIM (mean 1.8 mm) and decussating dentato-rubro-thalamic tract. For rescue DBS, ventral VIM stimulation yields the greatest tremor reduction, while central VIM stimulation balanced tremor control with adverse effects. LESSONS: DBS is a safe, effective rescue treatment for failed thalamotomy without needing to retarget the prior lesion site. The authors advocate for prospective studies of initial DBS targeting 2 mm anterior to standard VIM coordinates, reducing intraoperative readjustment for central VIM stimulation; and initial thalamotomy targeting 1 mm anterior and 1.2-1.5 mm superior to standard coordinates for durable tremor control through ablation of both central and ventral VIM. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25955.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Luu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a61af8bfaa9903c5116a5c7https://doi.org/10.3171/case25955
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Tremor Recurrence in MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy for Essential Tremor: DBS vs. Re-lesion2026
  2. 2Deep brain stimulation for tremor recurrence after focused ultrasound thalamotomy - retrospective case series and literature review.2026
  3. 3Loss of Efficacy in Ventral Intermediate Nucleus Stimulation for Essential Tremor2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4Is It Safe to Have Deep Brain Stimulation after MRI-Guided Focused Ultrasound Ablation? A Report of Three Cases and Review of Literature2026 · 2 citations
  5. 5Deep brain stimulation for essential tremor in patients with ventriculomegaly2024